Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Report <br />City Council Meeting <br />May 19, 1997 <br />Summary of Proposed Changes <br />The following briefly summarizes the changes that have been made: <br />Deletion of Transition Requirements <br />At the time that the Agreement was executed, a wide variety of things <br />needed to be done to complete the transaction. Specific requirements were established <br />that included the obligation to hire all City personnel, the obligation to provide a letter of <br />credit for completion of the MRF facility, payment of a transition fee, conducting a <br />customer satisfaction survey, acquisition of appropriate vehicles for service, and the like. <br />The amendment purports to remove only those provisions that have been fulfilled. By <br />the deletion of some of those provisions, however, the amendment eliminates certain <br />protections that were built into the agreement. <br />For example, all the representations regarding payment of lobbyists and <br />gifts and contributions contained in Exhibit 2.01 have been deleted. Those <br />representations were made as of the date of execution of the Agreement and no <br />subsequent amendment should delete them. To do so may invalidate the original <br />representation. In view of the fact that there is no need to make such a change, it is <br />surprising that the change has been proposed. <br />Further, the representation regarding hiring of all City employees has also <br />been deleted. While it may be argued that Taormina fulfilled this obligation, as you are <br />aware, there is some concern that City employees were later terminated by Taormina. If <br />the obligation has been properly performed, there should be no problem in leaving the <br />provision in the Agreement. Ordinarily, Agreements are not revised simply to chronicle <br />performance. In addition, the remaining obligation to City employees who are still with <br />Taormina should be preserved. <br />City Guarantee of Exclusive Franchise <br />The amendment purports to restate a "warranty" by the City that Taormina <br />is intended to have an exclusive franchise within the City and that that franchise will <br />extend to all City accounts upon termination of the existing franchise agreement with <br />Jack's Disposal, Inc. ("Jack's"). That warranty is absent from the existing Agreement. <br />Taormina, in Exhibit 4.02(b) has not only created this warranty, it has attempted to make <br />the warranty retroactive to the date of execution of the Agreement. Further, Taormina's <br />changes impose a penalty on the City equal to approximately $2.4 million if the City fails <br />to terminate its franchise agreement with Jack's by 1999. That was never part of the <br />