1995 ADJ JT MIN FEB 28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED JOINT REGULAR MEETING PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES February 28, 1995 In accordance with notice duly and legally given, an Adjourned Joint Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton and the City Council of the City of Colton was held on the above given date at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 650 North La Cadena Drive, Chairperson Beltran and Mayor Fulp presiding. RDA ROLL CALL: Members present were Hutton, Sandoval, Bennett, Fulp, Cook, Sanders and Chairperson Beltran. Also present were Executive Director Martinez, Economic Development Director Gabriel, General Counsel Biggs and Assistant Secretary Ramos. CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present were Hutton, Sandoval, Bennett, Cook, Sanders, Beltran and Mayor Fulp. Also present were City Manager Martinez, Economic Development Director Gabriel, City Attorney Biggs and City Clerk Ramos. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Fulp announced that this was a Joint Public Hearing of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton and the City Council for the City of Colton for Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 657 of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton and a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Colton Approving a Certain Disposition and Development Agreement By and Between the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton and Allan Steward. Moved by Member Sandoval, seconded by Member Cook, to approve REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 657. Counci lmember /Member Hutton said at the February 21, 1995, Joint Public Hearing Meeting, he had asked for a copy of the Letter of Intent by and between the Developer and Zendejas Restaurant. Economic Development Director Gabriel informed that a copy of the letter was included as part of the Agenda Packet. Mayor/Member Fulp informed that the letter was a non-binding Letter of Intent. Mayor/Member Fulp stated that certain conditions that existed in the original agreement have been changed and the changes have not been incorporated into a revised agreement. He suggested that a 1 FE3 ? 3 '1995