Laserfiche WebLink
Director Clarke mentioned that PCA is one mechanism to do that. For example, since <br />residential sales were somewhat higher than anticipated, the City did over collect which <br />produced a small amount of residential PCA money that the City could either hold to mitigate <br />future costs or can be rolled back to the customers. <br />Councilmember Bennett asked if we could put together a report for the next agenda that outlines <br />the steps we would have to take to give a reduction to our residents. Director Clarke responded <br />that the number can be calculated but it would be a short term (2 or 3 month) reduction. <br />Councilmember Sanders asked to what degree of the PCA monies did we over collect. Director <br />Clarke responded that it was a modest amount in the range of $50,000 and $100,000. We set <br />the PCA. We did forecast and our expectations were a little aggressive. <br />Director Clarke explained that baseline is a different issue than the PCA. We have run the <br />analysis before for the change from 250 to 400. Southern California Edison has a myriad of <br />baseline allowances and those are based on geographical regions. Those regions most closely <br />aligned with the City of Colton give a baseline allowance between 327 and 380. For the City <br />of Colton to give a 400 kilowatt hour allowance in the first block would result in approximately <br />$50,000 a month in revenues that would have to be assessed at a higher block. <br />Councilmember Sanders inquired as to the kilowatt plus and a band break. Director Clarke <br />responded that normally when you look at the band, there is a special study that is called a <br />Frequency Analysis, and you group all your sales data then you look for a natural break and that <br />is where you find a break point. That occurs at around 250, there is not another break until you <br />get around 400 kilowatt hours. You can set it at any level you would like. The higher you go <br />the more it impacts the higher use customers because you are transferring more money into that <br />block of space. <br />To Councilmember Hansen's question, about what would be powered at the 250 unit level, <br />Director Clarke said it would cover basic needs: a refrigerator, which would account to half or <br />two-thirds of the 250 level, depending on the efficiency of the unit; most of the lighting needs <br />for a family of four; and basic cooking needs if you don't have an electric oven and you have <br />a microwave with a gas stove it should cover the microwave use and the lighting in the kitchen. <br />Councilmember Hansen compared the drop in revenue to the net profit of the Electric Utility of <br />$2.3 million. Director Clarke responded the City cannot have a profit and a part of that money <br />goes into the debt service reserve which is to continue 30 years. <br />Director Clarke said that while the City had sales in excess of our projected expenditures, we <br />have also had additional power costs that do not show in the report. The City had costs that <br />went into effect this year and that is why it raised the PCA. The second allocation from San <br />Juan goes into effect starting January of this year which adds $600,000 a year to the requirement <br />of our San Juan obligation. Also the City had additional costs of $300,000 for its share of the <br />transmission facilities to bring that home. This totals $1 million plus $1.5 million of debt <br />U. <br />n r% -r i C wVft& <br />