Laserfiche WebLink
services on a cost efficient basis in the City of Colton. <br />SBPEA Representative Elaine Craig informed that it was line staff <br />who prepared the tentative proposal. She stated that exploring the <br />possibility of the City keeping the sanitation service did not <br />abridge the RFP process in progress. <br />Messrs. Chris Gallegos and Al Oliveras spoke on behalf of the <br />tentative proposal. <br />Motion/second by Hutton/Fulp to call for the question carried with <br />CM Hansen voting "No." <br />Motion and second as previously stated to return with a <br />comprehensive outline plan carried with Beltran/Sanders voting <br />"No. it <br />As requested by CM Sanders, Constance Hornig, Attorney, addressed <br />the question on whether the process is flawed by taking this <br />action. She deduced that City Council was looking at an <br />"alternative" proposal --a different -option, _which did not disturb <br />the RFP process in progress: <br />CM Hutton advised the existing 'franchise haulers that the City of <br />Colton must submit an annual report to State, as mandated by AB <br />939, and asked for quantity reports. He said he was placing the <br />private haulers on notice <br />AGENDA REVIEW: (Continued,) <br />Upon review of agenda," Mayor Fulp stated that the Closed Session <br />Items A and B would be heard and he declared the balance of the <br />agenda items and to receive and review the R. W. Beck Matrix and <br />Council to weigh thereon, continued for an Adjourned Regular <br />Meeting on Wednesday, April 24, 1996 at 6:00'P. M. <br />Mr. John Mitchell protested to the continuance of items 32 and 33. <br />Motion by CM Bennett to continue the meeting to 'address these items <br />failed for lack of a second. <br />Motion/second by Sanders/Beltran to observe the adjournment time <br />carried with "No" votes by Mayor Fulp/ Bennett/Hansen. <br />CLOSED SESSION: <br />At request of City Attorney, motion/second by Mayor Fulp/Hutton to. <br />add to Closed Session a late -breaking matter, identified as the <br />claim of Gamache v City of Colton, as there is a need to take <br />immediate action, pursuant to Government Code Section <br />54954.2 i(b) (`2) , and the -matter arose subsequent to the posting of <br />the Agenda, pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(a) <br />Unanimous Vote. <br />10 <br />APR.,16 1998 <br />