Laserfiche WebLink
lawn ordinance, rights of ways in front of private properties. Discussion followed on whether <br />regulations would be applied to businesses and residents alike; screening of vehicles; abandoned <br />vehicles; landscaping of rights of ways; curbs and gutters; and, storm drains. Comments <br />followed on code enforcement and the Uniform Building Code provisions and the Uniform <br />Property Dangerous Buildings provisions. It was emphasized that the proposed ordinance was <br />expected to provide sufficient enforcement authority to gain compliance for the City Code. Sgt. <br />Coe stated that the intention was to make Code enforcement officers proactive by using the <br />administrative fines and penalties program. It was noted that the citizen volunteers were in <br />charge of hanging (trashcan) door hangers and nuisance notices. Sgt. Coe reported that the <br />primary hearing authority in nuisance abatement and public nuisance abatement issues would be <br />the Code Enforcement/Housing Appeals Board. If the Board was not able convene, Sgt. Coe <br />noted that a provision in the proposed ordinance allowed the City Manager to appoint the hearing <br />authority, for the interim, to hear a specific case or cases so that matters could proceed. <br />Sergeant Coe agreed to bring all subject ordinances together and to highlight the proposed <br />changes. Inquiry was made on South Rancho businesses that had no landscaping versus those that <br />were required to have landscaping; Sgt. Coe agreed to investigate the matter. It was reported that <br />approximately 35 volunteers have developed their work schedules; maintained logs and worked <br />quadrants of the City. Sergeant Coe described a recent Code Enforcement Commission workshop <br />where the Brown Act and the Code Enforcement program were discussed. <br />With consent and direction from City Council, City Manager Garcia said the proposed ordinance <br />would be presented to the Commission for its review and approval prior to bringing it to the City <br />Council. City Manager Garcia said he understood that Council wanted Chapter 19 to be <br />comprehensive to expound on weed abatement, alleys, green lawn, public rights of ways, the <br />definition of landscaping, the assurance that this action would apply to businesses as well as <br />residential customers; pros and cons of volunteerism; and that application of the law be done <br />fairly. <br />Sergeant Coe said a special meeting would be called during the month of May and that he would <br />agendize this item for extensive discussion and review with the attorney and that the proposed <br />ordinance would be returned to Council's first meeting in June. Discussion followed on whether <br />or not the administrative fees, fines and penalties program, comparable to Riverside's program, <br />was acceptable. Fines were found to be competitive; however, it was suggested that there be <br />flexibility on the time for compliance. Sgt. Coe stated that a "reasonable amount of time" term <br />was included so that each individual instance would be taken into consideration. In conclusion, <br />Council discussed the hardship waiver application (appeal from citation.) and the responsibility <br />of the occupant versus landlord regarding property maintenance. <br />ADJOURNMENT: <br />At 7:39 P. M., with consensus of City Council, Mayor Pro Tempore Emeritus Cook declared the <br />meeting adjourned. <br />=S ELGA , DepntyCityClerk <br />City Council Adj Mins Apr 11, 2000 2 <br />