Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 � <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />3. 1 C8MMlT|EE SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE DIRECTOR. <br />4. TH� DIRECTOR SHAiL AECEIUE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE <br />CUMMlTTEE ON ALL PROJECTS DESCR(BED HEREIN. <br />f. THE DIRECTOR MAY HAQE SCHEDULED MEETlN�S OF THE <br />COnMlTTEE. HOWEUER, THE U7RECTOR MAY (.,-.ALL nFETINf--,S AT HIS <br />CUNVEw(ENCE OR POLL MEMBERS AS SITUATIONS MAY WAHRANT' <br />B. PUHPOSE. THF.' PURPOSE OF 'THIS PROCEDURE IS: <br />1. TO HLLEUTATE THE BUPDENSDIE IMPACT OF THE STRICT <br />EmFORCEMEmT OF RE(^"ULATlONS PERTAINING TO MAJOR VARIANCES, <br />DE7ERM1WATIONS' LARI-,"ER SUBDlVl�lONS, AND SIMILAR <br />REGULATIONS WHEN THESE REGULAT(ONS APPLIED TO MINOR <br />VARIANCES AmD MINOR InU8DlulSlONS- <br />2' TO ELIMINATE ANY UNNECESSARY WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY ON <br />THF PAR[ OF BOTH APpLICONTS AND CITY OFFICIALS WHEN THE <br />Mr-'lGN711_lUF OF APpL]CATION OR REQUEST DOES NOT WARRANT MAJOR OR <br />E'XTEN'SIVE. CONSlDEROTlON, AND WHFRE THE PROBABILITY IS HIGH <br />!HAT THE APPLICATION WOULD NOT BE CONTROUERSl�L� <br />3. TO PRUUlDE A POTENTIAL APPL{CONT WITH A MEANS OF HAVING A <br />PYOPOSED OEUELOPMENT CONCEPT REUIEljklED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A <br />FORMAL �PPL]CAT \ON; <br />