Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R-16-93 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COLTON <br />PETITIONING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY <br />BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NOT TO APPEAL THE <br />DECISION RENDERED BY RIVERSIDE SUPERIOR <br />COURT JUDGE MICHAEL KAISER IN THE LAWSUIT <br />BETWEEN THE COUNTY (ICEMA), THE CITY OF <br />SAN BERNARDINO AND OTHER RESPONDENTS. <br />WHEREAS, The current economy is causing a severe <br />economic hardship on the State, the County of San Bernardino and <br />local governments within the County, requiring layoffs, <br />reductions in employees salaries and an overall reduction in <br />services to the public, and <br />WHEREAS, Fire, Life Safety and Emergency Medical <br />Services provided by the State, County, Cities and Fire Districts <br />within this County, have been reduced due to a significant <br />reduction in the revenue received from the State and the <br />reduction in local revenue, and <br />WHEREAS, Further cuts in the revenue received from the <br />State and a reduction in revenue raised locally is anticipated, <br />requiring additional cuts in these Fires, Life Safety and <br />Emergency Medical Services, and <br />WHEREAS, The recent lawsuit, brought by the County of <br />San Bernardino (ICEMA), against the City of San Bernardino, other <br />cities and fire districts in the County, to determine who has <br />jurisdiction over the delivery of emergency medical services, has <br />been divisive, poor public policy and costly, and <br />WHEREAS, The recent ruling by Riverside Superior Court <br />Judge Michael Kaiser in this lawsuit, clarified California Health <br />& Safety Code Section 1797 et seq., recognizing the County <br />Emergency Medical Authority's role in medical control and quality <br />