Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />'I <br />5 <br />6 <br />I <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />i <br />19 1 <br />i <br />20 <br />J <br />21 <br />22 <br />i <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />native-born residents to become dependent on welfare, according to the <br />California Senate Office of Research and data from the INS; and, <br />WHEREAS, contrary to Proposition 187 propaganda, immigrants <br />cannot be blamed for the Saving & Loan Bail -Out, and the billions it has <br />cost taxpayers because of conspicuous consumption and over -speculation or <br />the Defense Industry cut-backs, and the subsequent lay-offs that have <br />burdened the local economy. According to a study by the Urban Institute, <br />immigrants in California contribute $30 billion in taxes, while receiving <br />barely half that amount in government services; and, <br />WHEREAS, Proposition 187 proponents ignore the existing policies <br />adopted by other law enforcement agencies, that already formalize coopera- <br />tion between local governments and INS when undocumented persons are <br />arrested for multiple misdemeanor offenses, high grade misdemeanors or <br />felon offenses. Computer -networked booking systems, throughout the state, <br />effectively report all suspected undocumented arrestees to the INS; and, <br />WHEREAS, Proposition 187, aside from duplicating already - <br />existing law enforcement practices, also would raise serious legal issues by <br />removing the requirement of "reasonableness" to any arrest --a basic consti- <br />tutional protection against arbitrary government action; and, <br />WHEREAS, while studies have indicated that less than 10 percent of <br />the Latino community in California is undocumented, Proposition 187 <br />creates a cloud of suspicion --and places the burden of proof --on all Latinos <br />to prove their legality, despite a heritage of contributions, history and valor <br />in the Golden State; and, <br />WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled this year <br />in Gonzalez -Rivera, vs. INS that a stop based on race, or ethnic appearance, <br />is an egregious Constitutional violation; the Court comments: "(We) should <br />