Laserfiche WebLink
DowSign Ervelope to' 7C3788FA-OE92497241641-3148911C7BE3 <br />shall pay a total amount of $834,545.04 ("TOTAL PAYMENT') as the maximum <br />amount to be paid to PLAINTIFFS to settle this case, not including attorneys' fees and <br />costs. The TOTAL PAYMENT represents the total amount of unpaid overtime and <br />unpaid CTO cash outs owed to PLAINTIFFS over the period of September 22, 2016 <br />through September 21, 2019, as well as liquidated damages. <br />From the TOTAL SETTLEMENT AMOUNT, and in addition to the TOTAL <br />PAYMENT made to PLAINTIFFS, CITY shall also pay $272,274.99 in attorneys' fees <br />and costs. The PARTIES agree the fees and costs agreed to herein are fair and <br />reasonable, given the time and costs expended and the fact that the fees are slightly less <br />than twenty-five percent (25%) of the TOTAL SETTLEMENT AMOUNT paid by CITY <br />to settle the ACTION. <br />b. The amount paid to each PLAINTIFF is a pro rata distribution of the TOTAL <br />PAYMENT, based upon the number of contract overtime hours each PLAINTIFF <br />worked between September 22, 2016 and September 21, 2019, the amount of their cash - <br />in -lieu of health benefits payments and incentive payments, and the amount of CTO cash <br />outs ("DAMAGES PAYMENT"). To determine the amount of unpaid overtime owed <br />to each PLAINTIFF, CITY verified the amount of monies provided to Plaintiffs for either <br />the cash -in -lieu of health benefits, or additional incentive payments, or both. This amount <br />was annualized and divided by the number of regularly scheduled hours each employee <br />worked in a given year, to arrive at the alleged hourly regular rate of pay shortage. If the <br />employee was paid on a salary basis, this hourly regular rate shortage amount was then <br />multiplied by 1.5 and then multiplied by all overtime hours the employee worked or was <br />deemed to work, including contract overtime hours in excess of FLSA-recognized <br />overtime hours, pursuant to the terms of the applicable CITY Memorandum of <br />Understanding ("MOU") with employee organizations, within a given year. If the <br />employee was paid on an hourly bases, the hourly regular rate shortage was then <br />multiplied by .5 and then multiplied by all overtime hours the employee worked or was <br />deemed to work, including contract overtime hours in excess of FLSA-recognized <br />overtime hours, pursuant to the terms of the applicable CITY MOU within a given year. <br />The hourly regular rate shortage amount was also added to an employee's regular rate of <br />pay and multiplied by the number of CTO hours that were cashed out by an employee in <br />a given year. No other credits or offsets otherwise available to CITY pursuant to 29 <br />U.S.C. Section 207(h)(2) were applied in making these calculations. The amounts <br />received by PLAINTIFFS are listed in Exhibit A attached hereto. <br />C. Each PLAINTIFF'S signature on this AGREEMENT constitutes an <br />acknowledgment of the individual settlement payment to that employee, affirming <br />the DAMAGES PAYMENT is accepted as fair, just, and reasonable, and constitutes <br />a full and complete payment in resolution of all claims asserted in the ACTIONS <br />against CITY. <br />d. The PARTIES agree that this methodology is fair, just, and reasonable with <br />respect to the legal value of the claims of the PLAINTIFFS. <br />C. CITY disputes it owes the overtime wages or additional CTO cash outs <br />asserted by PLAINTIFFS in the ACTIONS, since even if it has overtime liability, it <br />