Laserfiche WebLink
I WHEREAS, the funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund (the 70% allocation) <br />2 will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the <br />proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), <br />3 as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population <br />or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision (those above 10,000 in <br />4 population). The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each <br />CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 to the Allocation Agreements and <br />5 provided to the City Council with this Resolution. The City's share of the CA Abatement <br />6 Accounts Fund will be a product of the total in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund <br />multiplied by the City's percentage set forth in Appendix 1 (the "Local Allocation"); and <br />7 <br />8 WHEREAS, a CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local <br />Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The <br />9 Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the <br />10 county in which the city is located, unless the city elects to take a direct election of the <br />settlement funds, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the <br />11 city has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at <br />least 60 days prior to a Payment Date; and <br />12 <br />13 WHEREAS, it the intent of this Resolution is to authorize the City to enter into the <br />14 Settlement Agreements by executing the Participation Agreements and to enter into the <br />Allocation Agreements by executing the signature page to those agreements. <br />15 <br />16 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />17 OF COLTON AS FOLLOWS: <br />18 <br />19 SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein <br />by this reference. <br />20 <br />21 SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to: (1) settle and release the City's <br />22 claims against the Settling Defendants in exchange for the consideration set forth in the <br />Settlement Agreements and Allocation Agreements and (2) execute any other <br />23 documents as may be necessary to fully settle and release the City's claims against the <br />Settling Defendants. <br />24 <br />25 SECTION 3. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the <br />26 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general <br />rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant <br />27 effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that <br />there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the <br />28 environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. <br />RVPUBWXM1666167.1 -3 <br />