Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For Council Meeting of June 19, 2001 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />APPROVAL: DARYL PARRISH, CITY MANAGER <br />M: KATHY KIVLEY, Assistant to City Manager <br />FROM: 1,k <br />SUBJECT: FINAL APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL MAP <br />14028 FOR RECORDATION -- COLCO PROPERTIES, INC. <br />DATE: June 11, 2001 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Parcel Map No. 14028 is a four -parcel residential subdivision located in the Reche Canyon <br />southeasterly section at Michelle Drive and Parvin Lane. This 2.25 -acre site is being developed <br />by Colco Properties, Inc. The underlining parent Tract Map (13362) to this Parcel Map <br />indicated a 120 -foot San Bernardino County Drainage Easement extending through this site. <br />The Engineer of Record Douglas L. Goodman of Goodman & Associates has conducted a <br />extensive search of the available records, to determine whether there is actually a recorded <br />easement in existence on this site, none was found. The title company, Fidelity National Title <br />Company, has done a rigorous search for a recorded document of any type which would have <br />established this easement, and they found none. Douglas Goodman met with Mazin Kasey at <br />San Bernardino County for the purpose of clarifying the 120 -foot S.B.C.D.E. shown on the <br />subject parcel map. Through the various discussions and research, the conclusion is there is <br />no evidence supporting that there is an easement on the property. The speculation at this point <br />is there may have been a tentative map or development study performed on the property at <br />some point prior to City of Colton annexation that suggested the need for this easement. <br />However, neither the City nor the County has any recorded easement nor justification for <br />same. The City Engineer reviewed the drainage calculations for the area, found the Q's (factor <br />in measuring amount of Drainage over section of land) to be very low, concluded that the need <br />for 120 -foot drainage easement is not necessary. His recommendation is that a 20 -foot <br />drainage easement along the northerly line of this property would meet the drainage <br />requirements for the surrounding flows. <br />QISCUSSIM: <br />The Parcel Map has been reviewed for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and local <br />ordinances. Staff recommends that the 120 -foot drainage easement be abandoned and accept <br />the proposed 20 -foot easement along the northerly line of the property for drainage. <br />Page 1 of 2 Item #11 <br />