Laserfiche WebLink
Item #5 <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 <br />ITO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />JAPPROVAL: Daryl Parrish, City Manager <br />FROM: City Attorney <br />ISUBJECT: Public Nuisance Ordinance <br />JDATE: August 27, 2002 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />The City of Colton (the "City") currently has an ordinance in effect that defines and <br />prohibits certain public nuisance conditions. The current ordinance further authorizes the <br />City Manager to designate a hearing authority to administratively hear and determine <br />whether such nuisances actually exist with respect to properties. The hearing authority is <br />currently authorized to order those persons in control of such properties to abate such <br />public nuisances. If such nuisances are not abated by the responsible parties, the City is <br />authorized to abate these nuisance conditions itself or through its contractors. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: <br />The City has the authority to adopt and enforce any local or sanitary ordinances not in <br />conflict with general laws, pursuant to Article 7, Section 11 of the California Constitution. <br />In addition, the City is authorized by Government Code section 38771 et sea. to declare <br />what conditions constitute public nuisances and to cause such nuisances to be abated. <br />The proposed ordinance adds certain environmental conditions to the City's current list of <br />conditions that constitute a public nuisance. The proposed ordinance also declares that <br />any other violation of the City's Municipal Code is a public nuisance that may be abated <br />pursuant to the hearing authority process. <br />In addition, the proposed ordinance clarifies several issues with regard to the responsibility <br />of persons causing such public nuisances. Specifically, the proposed ordinance clarifies <br />that conditions and activities are considered public nuisances, if otherwise defined as such <br />by the Municipal Code, irrespective of whether the condition or activity occurs within the <br />City or outside of the City's boundaries. Thus, for example, if a condition or activity <br />occurring outside of the City's boundaries causes a public nuisance to exist within the City's <br />boundaries, the person(s) responsible for the nuisance condition or activity to occur outside <br />the City would be responsible. <br />