My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
R-025-25 -
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2020-2026
>
2025
>
R-025-25 -
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2025 11:37:20 AM
Creation date
4/16/2025 10:57:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1) <br />3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />K. None of the characteristics listed under Government Code section 54221(f)(2) apply <br />to the Property. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />COLTON AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 1. That the findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct and are <br />incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and <br />through this Resolution. <br />SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that (i) the Property is no longer necessary for the <br />City's use, (ii) the Property is smaller than one-half acre in area because it is approximately 15,200 <br />square feet in area, and (iii) the Property is not contiguous to land owned by a state or local agency <br />that is used for open -space or low- and moderate -income housing purposes. Furthermore, the City <br />Council hereby finds that (i) the .Property is former right-of-way and that (ii) City desires to <br />transfer the Property to an owner of adjacent property. Finally, none of the characteristics listed <br />under Government Code section 54221(f)(2) apply to the Property. <br />SECTION 3. The City Council therefore declares that the Property is "exempt surplus land" <br />pursuant to section 54221(f)(1)(13) of the Act and pursuant to section 54221(f)(1)(E) of the Act. <br />SECTION 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code <br />Section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), the City Council finds that the mere designation of the Property <br />as "exempt surplus land" and authorization for the City Manager to comply with the Surplus Land <br />Act do not qualify as a "project" as defined in State CEQA Guidelines section 15378. First, Section <br />15378 defines a project as an activity that "has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical <br />change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the <br />environment." (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378(a).) Here, the action is to declare the Property <br />as "exempt surplus land", which will not result in either a direct physical change in the <br />environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. <br />Accordingly, the action is not a"project" subject to CEQA, (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15060(c).) <br />Second, Section 15378 explicitly excludes from its definition of "project" the following: <br />"organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect <br />physical changes in the environment." (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378(b)(5).) The action to <br />designate the Property as "exempt surplus land" constitutes an organizational or administrative <br />activity that will not result in a physical change in the environment, and it therefore is not subject <br />to CEQA. Further, the Resolution does not constitute a binding commitment to develop any <br />particular project or any particular use of the Property. <br />SECTION 5. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of <br />this Resolution to the California Department of Housing and Community Development in <br />accordance with the requirements of Section 400(e) of the Act's Guidelines. <br />SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution <br />is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such <br />decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. <br />-2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.