My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AR 112106 National Sign and Marketing Co
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
11/21/2006 6:00 pm
>
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
>
Appeal - File Index Number DAP-000-469:
>
TIME AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER THE CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM OCTOBER 17, 2006, THE COLTON PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP-000-469, A REQUEST FOR DESIGN REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MAJOR VARIANCE
>
AR 112106 National Sign and Marketing Co
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2014 8:15:22 PM
Creation date
2/19/2014 10:29:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agenda Item
Item Number
1
Submitted On
11/16/2006
Submitted By
Sabdi Espinoza
Item Title
AR 112106 National Sign and Marketing Co
ATRequest
1128
Status (2)
2
Department
City Clerk
Meeting Date
11/21/2006
Meeting Time
6:00:00 PM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City COUncllmembers <br />hltom: David Zamora, Comnnnlity Development Director <br />DATE: : November 2, 2006 <br />Rv: update on Meeting Between City Staff and National Sign and Marketing Corporation <br />Regardin�� Freeway Sign Application <br />On October 31, 2006, Assistant City Manager Mark Nuaimi and Community Development <br />Director David Zamora met with Steve Rosenbloom, the representative from National Sign and <br />Marketing Corporation ("National Sign"), in an attempt to arrive at a compromise position to National <br />Sign's proposed approach for the freeway sign. Atter further review of the material submitted by the <br />applicant that simulated the placement of the signs (included as attachment), it became apparent to <br />staff that the Planning Commission denial of the freeway sign application should be upheld. <br />Specifically, staff noted that even at the requested heights, the freeway sign is obscured by vegetation <br />and other signage in the area from the perspective of the freeway. Further, it is also apparent that the <br />need for increased height is a direct result of mature vegetation in the area and not a unique <br />"topogi-aphy" of the site. Staff shared this opinion with the representative of the applicant. <br />As an offer of compromise, City staff suggested that there was willingness to work on the <br />existing monument signage and the proposed changes that the applicant had pursued. However, Mr. <br />Rosenbloom indicated that his interest was solely in discussing the freeway sign and further dialog was <br />not warranted on the existing Il7onlllllent sign. <br />Mr. Rosenbloom requested an e-mail documenting City staff's position on this matter. City <br />Attorney Marco Martinez suggested that City staff prepare this memorandum to update the Council <br />and document City staffs discussion with Mr. Rosenbloom. This memorandum was forwarded to Mr. <br />Rosenbloom on Thursday, November 2, 2006. <br />Attachment: Freeway Sign Placement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.