Laserfiche WebLink
A�sar�i of( oliti-act f>r Agmicv rmprmeruents <br />refusing to provide service, leaving one contractor to provide improvements on each of those <br />respective trades with the exception of landscaping. On September 14, 2004, the Agency <br />Board authorized formal bidding and award of contract for landscape improvements for the <br />remainder of the fiscal year. Nineteen (19) lots were sold in fiscal year 2004/2005 leaving <br />forty-seven (47) Agency owned lots. <br />On June 7, 2005, some of the contractors were again agreeable to extend the term of the <br />contracts under the same terms and conditions and the Agency Board authorized the Executive <br />Director to extend the term of the contracts by one year (Amendment 1 or 2 respectively). The <br />Fence and Hardscape contractors did not agree to renew their contracts due to increases in the <br />cost of materials. Neither of those trades was sent out for bid since most of the vacant lots were <br />sold by that time and minimal improvements to fencing and hardscape were anticipated on lots <br />sold as tenant conversions. Five (5) lots were sold during fiscal year 2005/2006 leaving forty- <br />two (42) Agency owned lots. <br />On July 18, 2006, all contractors were agreeable to a third extension of their contracts under the <br />same terms and conditions except for Garage Electrical due to increased cost of materials and <br />labor; the Agency Board authorized the Executive Director to extend the term of the contracts by <br />one year (Amendment 2 or 3 respectively). Garage Electrical improvements were not sent out <br />for bid and were handled on an individual basis as-needed. To date during fiscal year <br />2006/2007 six (6) lots have been sold leaving thirty-six (36) Agency owned lots available for <br />sale; two of which are currently in escrow. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Recognizing that all the contracts for "finished lot" improvements have not been formally bid <br />since 2003. and the original 2003 and 2004 contracts with the same contractors have been <br />extended under the same terms and conditions three times, and knowing increases in the cost <br />of materials and labor have occurred during that time, formal bidding was initiated. Twenty- <br />seven (27) contractors were issued bid packages and responses were opened at 2:00 p.m. on <br />March 28, 2007. Bids were received on all seven trades from six different contractors. <br />Bidding consisted of units of construction for materials and labor. A "unit of construction" is <br />identified as the maximum amount of material required to rehabilitate the improvement specified <br />in the Scope of Improvements issued in each bid package. Each Hardscape Improvement will <br />require rehabilitation specific to the level of deterioration when rehabilitation commences. No <br />improvements will commence until the close of escrow on each lot sold. <br />One quote was received for Hardscape Improvements from Myers Construction, Inc., in the <br />amount of $1,100 per unit of construction. This contractor has provided quality materials and <br />workmanship in the past and was deemed qualified. Agency staff recommends that the contract <br />be awarded to Myers Construction, Inc. as the lowest bid and in an amount not to exceed <br />$1,100 per lot. <br />There are thirty-six (36) Agency owned lots on which improvements may be required, however <br />based on the number of lots sold during the past two years, it is anticipated that a total of ten <br />(10) might reasonably be sold during fiscal year 07/08. Therefore, the total amount of the <br />contract for Hardscape Improvements is not to exceed $11,000. Should excess of ten (10) lots <br />be sold, a request for amendment will be brought before the Agency Board for consideration. <br />R:\Administration\Meetings\2007 MeetingsWay 15, 2007\Agency Improvement Contracts\Hardscape Impr <br />Contract Staff Report 051507.doc <br />