Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council <br />Consider Adoption of Resolutions Placing Utility Users' Tax Measure on Ballot <br />August 3, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />• All rates suspended when audited general fund recurring revenue exceeds <br />$39.5M <br />• All rates terminated when audited general fund recurring revenue exceeds <br />$39.5M for 5 consecutive years <br />• 10 Year extension <br />• Updated terminology to address modern technology and issues <br />BACKGROUND <br />This item was continued from your June 8, 2010 Special Meeting and June 15, 2010 Regular <br />Meeting. <br />On March 2, 2004, the citizens of the City of Colton voted to implement a utility users' tax <br />("UUT") on water, electric, telephone, gas, video, trash and sewer service within the City. The <br />tax is currently set at 4% for residential customers and 6% for all non-residential (commercial, <br />industrial, other) customers. The tax became effective on April 6, 2004 and is scheduled to <br />terminate on June30, 201 L Further, the UUT ordinance (specifically with respect to <br />telecommunications and video) requires updates to address 21 st Century technology. <br />The UUT is a general tax which pays for public services such as police protection, fire and <br />paramedic services, street operations and maintenance, library services, senior citizen services <br />and parks/recreation services. The City currently receives approximately $5 Million per year <br />from the UUT, which is about 16% of the City's General Fund revenue. Although the City has <br />already taken measures to reduce costs, collection of UUT revenues after June 30, 2011 will be <br />critical to providing current levels of municipal services into FY 2011-2012 and thereafter. If the <br />UUT terminates, the City will be required to implement deeper cuts to City programs and <br />services in FY 2011-2012. <br />Also, because technology is moving at such a rapid pace, the current UUT ordinance contains <br />definitions, exemptions and references that have already become outdated for the 21st Cent <br />specifically with respect to telecommunications and video. In some cases, this outdated <br />language has resulted in lawsuits in other jurisdictions challenging the application of the UUT to <br />certain telephone/telecommunication services (ie: the Federal Excise Tax exemption). A ruling <br />adverse to the City on the Federal Excise Tax issue could result in a loss of revenue. Further, <br />many telephone and video companies are applying the UUT inconsistently, due to outdated <br />definitions and terms, exposing the City to future refund claims and legal challenges. <br />ISSUES/ANALYSIS <br />SENIOR & LOW-INCOME EXEMPTIONS REMAIN THE SAME <br />The proposed Measure would not change the existing senior citizen or low-income exemptions. <br />ORANGE\ WPRIEST\68322.8 <br />