My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1993 AGN JUN 15 I31
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1993
>
1993 June 15 Agenda Packet
>
1993 AGN JUN 15 I31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:35:10 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:09:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF COLTON <br />`c*orvarat ea y <br />AGENDA REPORT 1897 , <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 15, 1993 ° r oc9'. <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE`: JUNE 9, 1993 <br />FROM JERRY YOUNG <br />CITY MANAGER <br />I <br />SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIOIN FOR THE PROPOSED REORGANIZATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS <br />DEPARTMENT <br />BACKGROUND <br />Parks Division: <br />In Fiscal Year 1991, the Parks Division of Public Works was transferred to <br />the Human Services Department as it was felt by the previous administration <br />that the Parks Division was more closely aligned with recreational activities <br />and services. <br />During the period that the 'Parks Division has been with Human Services, it <br />has since been found that the Park's crews can work more cohesively when <br />teamed as a unit with the Public Works crews. <br />Utilities Division: <br />In Fiscal Year 1992, the Water and Waste Water Division of Public Works was <br />separated from Public Works and made into a new department, the Public <br />Utilities Department. <br />It was the previous administration's theory that by creating a new Public <br />Utilities Department with its own Department Head and staff, that a_savings <br />could be realized. It has since been found that it created an additional <br />expense. <br />DISCUSSION <br />It is proposed that by combining the staff of Public Works, Parks and <br />Utilities, that a more cohesive team effort can be applied when working <br />together as a unit under one department. <br />It is recommendedthatthe Public Works Operations Manager position be <br />deleted and a City Engineers position be created in its place to provide in- <br />house review of development plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.