Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1997 <br />SUBJECT: GENERAL WATER RATE INCREASE <br />In order to generate the $10 million to complete the capital improvement program, two options are <br />available to the City. First, retail rates could be raised, at some level to create a capital improvement <br />fund. At $500,000 per year, it would take approximately 20 years to raise the $10 million identified by <br />staff, and others. Obviously, at that rate, other system components would be in need of repair before <br />the initial projects were completed. Second, the City could issue debt to fund the capital improvement <br />program. This ensures that funds to complete the program are available at the beginning, and <br />throughout, the term of the construction projects. This approach also includes a rate increase to cover <br />the costs of the borrowed funds, much in the same magnitude as the internally funded program. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The first alternative is always to do nothing. The utility could operate as it has for the past few years and <br />hope that there are no major failures of the water system which could impair or halt our ability to produce <br />and deliver safe, reliable water service to the water customers. Clearly, this is not the alternative <br />proposed by staff and would be frowned upon by the State Department of Health Services and our <br />consulting engineers. <br />The second, and preferred alternative, is to issue bonds for the improvements. Here again, there are <br />various options available. Staff has investigated two viable ways to complete the debt funding. The <br />projects proposed would qualify for State Revolving Funds (SRF). These would be issued at a lower rate <br />than revenue bonds but include the following rather burdensome requirements and consequences: 1) <br />SRF procedures would delay receipt of the funds for two to three years; 2) SRF procedures .impose <br />additional engineering and administrative requirements that add costs, reduce flexibility, and may further <br />delay the projects; 3) time delays, in the completion of projects increase the risks to water system <br />reliability; 4) time delays can increase costs due to inflation. <br />Staff's preferred option is to participate in a proposed FARECal financing currently under preparation. <br />The City has preliminarily requested $10 million for the proposed capital improvement program. <br />Participation in the FARECal program offers some advantages even though the interest rate may be <br />higher than the SRF loan. The FARECal program would give the utility and the City greater flexibility <br />and latitude in any future financings and lessen some of the burden of dealing with the State as a <br />regulator of our debt. <br />Attached is a five Year financial forecast of the revenue requirements for the water utility. Simply put, <br />this forecast indicates that a 7.0% general rate increase is necessary to become effective June 30, 1997. <br />The increase would primarily be required to assure adequate funds to cover the new debt service for the <br />capital improvement program. At this time there are no significant additional operating costs projected <br />for the utility. Operational and maintenance costs have stabilized and staff sees no radical change from <br />the current level of operations. An increase of this magnitude would provide adequate coverage of the <br />debt and create a cash flow which would fund operations and provide for a modest reserve margin over <br />the next four years. Even with this increase, the forecast indicates that further adjustments may be <br />necessary during FY2000-01 in the range of 6 percent. It is difficult to say with any certainty that other <br />factors may come into play that will affect this projection. <br />Page 2 of 3 Item No. <br />