My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1997 AGN DEC 16 I24
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1997
>
1997 December 16 Agenda Packet
>
1997 AGN DEC 16 I24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:22:52 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For the Council Meeting of December 16, 1997 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />APPROVAL: Len Wood, Interim City Manager <br />FROM: Thomas K. Clarke, Utility DirectorCC--� <br />SUBJECT: Residential Rate Redesign <br />DATE: December 9, 1997 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Several City Council members have asked theElectricUtility to consider the feasibility of modifying the <br />residential rate design that would change the lifeline allowance. <br />DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS <br />The designs of electric rates undergo a number of tests to ensure that the rates are: 1) just and <br />reasonable; and, 2) ensure that proper revenues are collected in an equitable manner. The rate design <br />that is in place has undergone these tests and has demonstrated that a change could be made but not <br />without some give and take in the final design. However, to arbitrarily make a change without making all <br />the proper adjustments for equity and function, can be severely detrimental to the customer and/or the <br />Utility. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The alternates for rate design are almost infinite. As long as the concepts addressed above are adhered <br />to, any one of the possible designs could be deemed acceptable. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />Two different groups will be financially impacted by a rate design change. Obviously the consumer will <br />be affected. If the rate design is not implemented in a conscientious manner, certain customers will <br />benefit and others will be penalized. In addition, the Utility, and the General Fund, could be impacted <br />because of the change in revenues. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />None. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />That the City Council approve the existing rate design for the residential class and instruct staff to <br />continue to monitor class usage to determine if alternative designs would be beneficial in the future. <br />Attachments: Colton / SCE rate comparisons <br />Page 1 of 1 <br />Item 4 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.