Laserfiche WebLink
Here in the City of Colton, economic realities have dealt a strong blow to many city <br />services. Inflation, combined with declining subventions, tax cuts and spending limits, <br />has resulted in austere budgets at all levels. Colton like other cities have markedly <br />fewer budgeted dollars to meet rapidly escalating costs and a steadily increasing <br />demand for services.. Faced with this challenge, staff is constantly attempting to <br />identify areas for economy and potentials for increasing revenues. Putting programs and <br />facilities on a pay-as-you-go basis, where feasible, is one alternative. <br />As a result of many Parks and Recreation Commission meetings regarding this topic, <br />and summarized below, the collection of fees offers many pros and cons. <br />ARGUMENT IN FAVOR: <br />Fees can help the City of Colton: <br />• offset operations and maintenance costs <br />• expand services and facilities <br />• fund specialized leisure opportunities <br />• control facility use <br />• project an image of fiscal responsibility <br />When funding from other sources cannot be increased, fee revenues can enable the City <br />to keep pace with rising operations and maintenance costs. Should funding from other <br />sources decrease, fees provide a minimum revenue base to maintain needed services <br />that otherwise would have to be eliminated or seriously curtailed. When fees keep pace <br />with inflation, fee revenues can , make a greater contribution to the operations and <br />maintenance budget. Fees can help insure that the City of Colton has the capacity to <br />develop new facilities and offer new programs that are responsive to the ever changing <br />needs of the Council 'constituency. All other factors being equal, the case for the <br />expansion of needed services and facilities is enhanced by the ability to pay associated <br />costs and debts through user fees. <br />Fees and charges can be instituted in order to attain other.desirable objectives. In some <br />cases, the revenue producing potential of fees may be secondary to objectives such as: <br />• allocation of demand, particularly where demand exceeds facility capacity <br />• promotion of respect for services, thereby decreasing vandalism <br />• conservation of utilities utilized by participants <br />A.problem often associated with "free" services is abuse of those services and facilities. <br />People are more likely to regard the facility. as belonging to them when they have paid <br />to use it, and tend to treat it as they would treat their own home. <br />In an era of taxpayers' revolt, taxpayers are increasingly insistent that government be <br />frugal Citizens want government to provide services on the most efficient and equitable <br />basis. By way of Council adopting a well -conceived fee policy (R-129.94), Council has <br />projected the image of an agency that manages it revenues and resources well, and <br />provides services on an equitable basis. <br />