My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1999 AGN APR 20 I13
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1999
>
1999 April 20 Agenda Packet
>
1999 AGN APR 20 I13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 9:04:24 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:14:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Although Mr. Paige is in escrow to purchase the building at 310 Rexford, he will not be <br />permitted to use the building for any light industrial use based upon the existing HRM land use <br />designation and development standards included in the West Valley Specific Plan. Similarly, all <br />new businesses or property owners on Rexford Street will be affected as well. Under the <br />Specific Plan all of these properties must now somehow transition to a more commercial/retail <br />use, although the street, properties and buildings on Rexford are more suited and readily able to <br />accommodate more service or industrial uses. Currently the area is not ready or able to support <br />commercial uses. Requiring the existing buildings on Rexford to conform to the HRM land use <br />designation would render many of the buildings virtually unusable. Given the current situation, it <br />may be better for the City to allow light industrial uses to continue on Rexford until market <br />conditions can support the conversion to commercial uses. <br />Upon review of the Specific Plan's Land Uses map it appears that the intent of the Specific Plan <br />was to allow for a certain amount of flexibility in land uses , as evidenced by the Flexible Land <br />Use designations. (Please refer to Exhibit "A"). As stated in the Specific Plan, these flexible <br />boundaries were intended to allow the land uses in this section to be adjusted both in response <br />to market demand and to future development. (Please refer to definition of Flexible Land Use <br />Boundaries on Exhibit "C"). <br />In addition to this issue, Agency staff has reviewed the West Valley Specific Plan and <br />determined that there are certain inconsistencies in the document that should be addressed and <br />clarified (i.e., Hotel or Motel uses not permitted in;f;, the HRM designation). In addition, the <br />Specific Plan document should be updated to reflect and account for the planned realignment of <br />Valley Blvd. and Pepper Avenue. <br />Recommendation: <br />1. Approve an exemption to the West Valley Specific Plan's non conforming use provision for <br />that property located at 310 Rexford Street, thereby continuing the legal non -conforming <br />status of the property. <br />2. Direct City and Agency staff to review the West Valley Specific Plan and prepare <br />recommendations to update or revise the Specific Plan. <br />Attachments: <br />Exhibit "K - West Valley Specific Plan - Land Use Map <br />Exhibit T" - West Valley Specific Plan - Permitted Land Use Matrix. <br />Exhibit T" - West Valley Specific Plan — Land Use Definitions <br />�11 <br />Prepared by Greg Lantz, Program Manager <br />SAGreg=est Valley Exemption.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.