|
_ANALYSIS
<br />The following proposals were received:
<br />Carport
<br />Ve—r
<br />PowerLight Corporation
<br />Array Can act
<br />i
<br />Price
<br />Pric_ e_
<br />Solar Electrical Systems
<br />Utility Power Group
<br />28 KW
<br />22 KW'
<br />$192,975.00
<br />$157,299.65
<br />$
<br />Applied Power Corporation
<br />46 KW
<br />$381,191.00
<br />7,
<br />7,150
<br />$150
<br />$8,287
<br />*Pro
<br />18 KW
<br />$183,092.00
<br />$10,172
<br />posed system does not physically match the space specified in the RFP.
<br />Rooftop System
<br />Ve—r Array Canacit
<br />PowerLight Corporation Price Pric— e/KW
<br />_
<br />Solar Electrical Systems 37 KW $241,198.00 39 KW $6,519
<br />Applied Power Corporation 30 KW $274,062.58 $7,027
<br />Utility Power Group $243,106.00 $8,104
<br />25 KW $204,573.00
<br />Solar Utility Company would only$8,183
<br />cost of Utility
<br />Company
<br />provide a proposal to construct both installations at a total
<br />The combined cost of the selected proposers is $398,497.65.
<br />carport and the rooftop system satisfy the requirements of Sectio $
<br />Code as a Public Benefit project. ' The
<br />Section 385 of the Public Utilities
<br />ALTERNATIVES
<br />Other renewable generating technologies the City might consider are geothermal,
<br />biomass projects. The City may also choose to apply these funds in other ways
<br />the Public Benefit provisions of AB1890, such as energy efficiency, g ermal, wind, and
<br />discounts and weatherisions programs, or new energy consistent with
<br />y, low-income customer rate
<br />Projects. gy or conservation technoI
<br />gy research
<br />FINANCIAL IMPACT
<br />Funds are available in the public benefit program budget. To date $774,908
<br />and the amount spent is $92,873.69, leaving a balance of $682,034.31. It is r
<br />has been collected
<br />combined project cost of $398,497.65 be spread Proposed that the
<br />budget groups, those being the residential, commercial, industrial, lland other
<br />4
<br />All groups benefit from the public installation.public benefit
<br />r (municipal) group.
<br />RECOMMENDATION
<br />That the City Council accept the proposal of Solar Electrical Systems, Inc.,
<br />CA, for the solar carport, for, an amount not to exceed $157,299.65 a
<br />PowerLight Corporation of Berkeley, CA, for the rooftopsystem, of Westlake Village,
<br />$241,198.00, and authorize the City Manager to execute an contractual nd the proposal of
<br />for construction subject to the funding limits herein for amount not to exceed
<br />Ythatt documents required
<br />other proposals. specified, and that the City Council reject all
<br />Report prepared by Timothy C. Trewyn, P.E., Assistant Electric Utility Director
<br />Page 2 of 2
<br />Item No.
<br />
|