My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2000 AGN MAR 07 I02
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2000
>
2000 March 07 Agenda Packet
>
2000 AGN MAR 07 I02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 3:11:34 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:08:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Colton <br />Agenda Report <br />Council Meeting of March 7, 200Q <br />Page 2 <br />calculating each of the types of proposed development fees, as well as for existing <br />fees. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: <br />Topping Jacquess Consultants (the "Consultants") conducted an analysis of <br />development impact mitigation fees currently in place and identified additional <br />infrastructure and public service categories for which there currenUy exists no <br />development impact mitigation fee. Currently, the city assesses development fees for <br />parks, sewer, water, storm drainage fees (in two locations) and traffic. Additional <br />facilities and public services that were identified where development fees are currently <br />not collected but should be are for police station, fire station, library and civic center <br />improvements. <br />The Study contains an in-depth analysis of six infrastructure and public service <br />categories: Civic Center, Fire Station, Library, Parks, Police Station, and Traffic. Water <br />and Sewer fees were not included in this analysis because the Utility Department was <br />in the process of updating its Water and Wastewater Master Plan at the time the <br />Capital Infrastructure Study was conducted. Additionally, storm drainage fees were not <br />reviewed as part of this study. The consultant did suggest however that a storm drain <br />study be undertaken at some point in time in concert with the County of San Bernardino <br />Flood Control District. <br />Based on future infrastructure needs, the <br />could be allocated and collected from <br />category: <br />Civic Center <br />Fire Station <br />Library <br />Parks <br />Police Station <br />Traffic <br />TOTAL <br />$1,264,151 <br />$1, 750,180 <br />$2,278,064 <br />$7,441,824 <br />$2,452,616 <br />$13,174,502 <br />a28,361,337 <br />study determined that the following costs <br />�ew development for each infrastructure <br />If enacted the proposed development impact mitigation fees would be collected on a <br />per unit basis when new development occurs. None of the aforementioned fees would <br />be collected from existing businesses or residents. The development unit is equal to <br />one dwelling unit for residential and 1000 square feet of building area for commercial <br />and industrial projects. <br />The Study determined that for the six infrastructure and public service categories listed <br />above the current level of service is below the desired level of service in all categories <br />except the fire station category. The cure for these existing deficiencies however, <br />cannot be made the responsibility of new development. <br />AB 1600 <br />Assembly Bill 1600 (adopted in 1987) is the most commonly recognized legislation <br />dealing with the development fee issue. AB 1600 provides a detailed set of regulations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.