Laserfiche WebLink
KWr A. FKANKLW <br />Ronson <br />ATTORNEY AT LAW <br />DIRECT DIAL 415 995 MISS <br />Bal D6E11 <br />REPLY To SAN RtAN05CO <br />E-MLIdrwildbAPardarbrIdgam= N A I C 18 <br />November 30, 2001 V L O N 0 5 <br />BUIKlf <br />Ms. Sonia Carvalho <br />City Attorney <br />Best Best & Krieger <br />3750 University Avenue, Suite 400 <br />Riverside, CA 92501 <br />RE: Request for Participation in a)~riends of the Court Brief <br />Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority <br />Dear Ms. Carvalho: <br />We write to request participation from cities in an amicus brief where more than 100 public agencies <br />have already joined in asking the California Supreme Court to reverse a recent Court of Appeal decision <br />that is damaging to the entire California public agency community. The case, Bonanno x Central <br />Contra Costa Transit Authority CCCCTA'), will greatly expand dangerous condition of public property <br />liability unless reversed. The Supreme Court granted review in September. With review granted, we <br />are filing a brief on behalf of California governmental agencies. <br />As the attached letter urging the Court to grant review explains, Bonanno suggests that public agencies <br />may now be liable for property that they do not own, operate or control and dangerous conditions they <br />do not create. Specifically, Bonanno exposes a public entity to liability whenevei,its property "beckons" <br />the public to cross adjacent property where a hazard exists, even though the public entity neither owns <br />nor controls the adjacent property. We are optimistic that the California Supreme Court will overrule <br />the decision. Otherwise, Bonanno will spawn a significant volume of additional dangerous condition <br />litigation, resulting in increased governmental legal budgets and potentially costly verdicts. <br />We believe it's essential to convey that Bonanno's expansion of dangerous condition liability threatens <br />any public entity in California that has publicly accessible property. To demonstrate this, as amici or <br />friends of the court, Hanson Bridgett is preparing an amicus brief on behalf of many local agencies — <br />an effort supported by both the League of California Cities and the California State Association of <br />Counties. We hope that the city you represent will support this effort too. Doing so involves no cost <br />and only minimal effort — after obtaining appropriate approval, it simply needs to complete and return <br />the form enclosed with this letter. <br />LAW OFFICRS <br />YWVVANAN ON6NDGETLCOM <br />535 M "I T STR63T <br />33RD BOOR <br />SAN NuSNCISCO . CALIFORNIA 941954177 <br />THSP1,I01,49 413.7/1-0309 <br />FACSIMILE 41"1.9355 <br />SPQHANSONORIDGM.COM <br />MARIN <br />WOOD m/MID <br />w E SIR FRANCR DRAKE EIYD..AATR JR <br />LARKSMIR • CALIFORNIA 94959 <br />1YISFNONr 415.92S.0400 <br />FACSIMILE 415.1234195 <br />MARIN®NANSONRRIDGCTT.COM <br />n014INYN STREET <br />5UIr9 1999 <br />SACRAMVA .CAN/OM41A 95914 <br />111LWIOW 914.44"" <br />FACAMIU 9ummmg <br />V4@14A W ONORIDGETrcoM <br />