Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For the City Council and Colton Utility Authority Meeting of November 6, 2001 <br />TO: Honorable Chairperson and Utility Authority Members <br />FROM: Thomas K. Clarke, Utilities Director - <br />Item #3 <br />SUBJECT: Adoption and Approval of Ordinance Authorizing a General Rate Increase for Sewer Service <br />DATE: October 16, 2001 <br />BACKGROUND <br />On July 18, 2000, the Colton City Council approved the formation of the Colton Utility Authority, which <br />established a financial mechanism, vis-cl-vis, a leaseback arrangement that would mitigate a portion of the <br />proposed sewer rate increase. The increase was the direct result of two construction financings to expand the <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant and remove the cease and desist order that the City of Colton has been working <br />under since 1995. <br />DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS <br />In 1995, the City of Colton received a cease and desist order from the Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />(Board) that required the City to address a shortfall in reliable treatment capacity at the plant. Under the State's <br />mandates, when a treatment facility reaches 75 percent of its reliable capacity, it must provide a plan to the <br />Board of how it will come back into compliance. The cease and desist order was issued because of the City's <br />ongoing failure to address the deficiency and other issues at the plant. Shortly after the receipt of the order, the <br />City evaluated several treatment techniques that would add to the reliable capacity, and after a lengthy process, <br />chose a conventional ditch -type treatment method. <br />Design and construction followed using funds from the State Revolving Fund in the amount of approximately <br />$7.1 million that would add 2 million gallons per day of additional treatment capacity. The State loan has <br />provisions that require repayment of the loan to commence twelve months after the ditches became operational. <br />To date, completion as defined under the State Revolving Fund loan has not occurred. Part of the construction <br />contract called for an engineering evaluation and remediation of a portion of Unit 1 at the plant (built in 1949). <br />Upon operation of the two new ditches, Unit 1 was taken out of service and inspected. The results of that <br />inspection concluded that the unit was not a viable candidate for rehabilitation, and, in fact, was not physically fit <br />to provide any "reliable" service. Under these circumstances, the City could not satisfy its reliable capacity <br />requirements. <br />To address the cease and desist order, Staff, the Utilities Commission, and the City Council all agreed that <br />Phase 2 of the plant expansion was necessary. Under this plan, the construction of two more ditches was <br />required. A change order was issued to the contractor on site and construction began. These two ditches were <br />estimated to cost $4 million (a considerable savings over the first two). Funding for this phase was provided <br />through a traditional revenue bond issued under the umbrella of the newly formed Colton Utility Authority. This <br />issue was actually for approximately $5.8 million, the difference to be used for other wastewater construction and <br />pipeline replacement. <br />Action to form the Colton Utility Authority resulted directly from the estimated rate increases required to repay the <br />debt obligations associated with the State Revolving Fund loan and the bond issuance, along with the <br />relationship of the transfer of revenues from the Water and Wastewater Divisions to the General Fund. Staff <br />originally estimated that the overall impacts would result in an increase in retail sewer rates in the neighborhood <br />of 33 percent. The City Council asked staff to look at operational alternatives that would reduce the amount of <br />Page 1 of 2 (w/Attachments) <br />