Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON Item #18 <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For City Council Meeting of April 16, 2002 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Dilu deAlwis, Finance Director �^� <br />a- <br />SUBJECT: Award a contract to Synergen, Inc., for the implementation of a Work Order System in an <br />Amount not to exceed $450,000 <br />DATE: March 28, 2002 <br />BACKGROUND <br />On July 17, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract to Eden Systems for an upgrade to the City's <br />existing financial system software. The upgrade to the Windows-based, Inforum Gold version does not <br />include a work order module; it was the City's intent at that time to solicit proposals for a stand-alone work <br />order system that would be fully integrated with the upgraded version of Eden. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSI5 <br />A Request for Proposal was mailed to seven prospective vendors on October 30, 2001. Two vendors <br />responded — Synergen, Inc., and GBA Master Series. Both vendors provided on-site demonstrations for <br />staff to evaluate. While both systems have experience working with water and wastewater systems, only <br />Synergen, Inc. has experience with electric systems. <br />Currently, the City does not have the capability to capture all costs associated with capital projects; <br />consequently, estimates are ofren given as to the total cost of a project, which excludes cost components <br />such as labor and equipment. The implementation of a work order system would alleviate this problem, and <br />allow staff to calculate accurate costs, plan the costs of projects more accurately, as well as track the costs <br />of projects under construction more closely. While the cost for purchasing the work order system proposed <br />by Synergen, Inc. is substantial, staff feels that this system is the best fit for the urilities and the City. The <br />inveshnent in this system will pay for itself over time in terms of real savings realized through increased <br />operational efficiencies, and improved management of resources such as personnel, assets, inventories, and <br />budgets. The average payback for a computerized maintenance management system is 14.5 months, with <br />average savings of 283% in maintenance productivity, 19.4% in lower material costs, and 17.8% in <br />inventory reduction. <br />With the advent of projects like the Colton Jets Power Plant, Big League Dreams Sports Park, and various <br />capital improvement projects, the implementation of a work order system this year is timely and extremely <br />important to accurately caphare and track costs. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Reject all bids and continue to work without a work order system; however, to do so would be detrimental <br />to the enterprise funds, as the Regional Water Quality Control Board has required the Wastewater <br />Deparhnent to obtain a computerized maintenance management system. In addition, the State Water <br />Resources Board recommends the use of a computerized maintenance management system to increase the <br />efficiency and reliability of Water Depariment operations. <br />