Laserfiche WebLink
captioned complaint proceedings pertaining to the California ISO's allocation and <br />collection of energy costs incurred as a result of schedule deviations through neutrality <br />adjustment charges during the period June 1, 2000 through February 26, 2001. <br />BACKGROUND <br />To avoid an intervention in market operations or prevent or relieve a system <br />emergency, during the period June 1, 2000 through December 11, 2000, the California <br />ISO purchased energy to serve the loads of Scheduling Coordinators who did not <br />schedule or deliver enough energy to meet the real-time needs of their loads. The <br />California ISO allocated costs incurred by the California ISO for Dispatch instructions <br />made by the California ISO to serve the Loads of Scheduling Coordinators who did not <br />adequately Schedule or deliver enough Energy to all Scheduling Coordinators, including <br />to those Scheduling Coordinators who Scheduled and delivered enough Energy to <br />serve their own Load, in the form of neutrality adjustment charges. The neutrality <br />adjustment charges billed to all Scheduling Coordinators included the costs of energy <br />procured through out -of market dispatches by the California ISO as well as the costs of <br />energy procured within California ISO markets in excess of the applicable market <br />clearing price, or soft cap, in effect during this time period., The neutrality adjustment <br />charges were assessed based on the ratio of each Scheduling Coordinator's metered <br />Demand and Exports to the total metered Demand and Exports in each Settlement <br />Interval. <br />1 A $250/MWh break point, or soft price cap, was in effect when energy was procured by the <br />Califomia ISO in December 2000. A $150/MWh break point, or soft cap, was in effect when energy was <br />Procured by the California ISO during the period January 1, 2001 through February 27, 2001. <br />2 <br />