My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2003 AGN JUL 01 I14
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
2003 July 1 Agenda Packet
>
2003 AGN JUL 01 I14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 12:35:31 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:03:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Engineer's Report <br />Landscaping, Lighting and Maintenance District No. 2 <br />FY 2003-2004 <br />Part II — Method of Apportionment <br />A. General <br />The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the <br />purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, <br />maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The <br />1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to <br />benefit rather than assessed value: <br />"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may <br />be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net <br />amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated <br />benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. - <br />The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels, <br />and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on <br />estimated benefit to each parcel. <br />In addition, pursuant to the Article XMD Section 4, a parcel's assessment may not <br />exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel <br />and provides that only special benefits may be assessed. <br />B. Benefit Analysis <br />Each of the proposed improvements, the associated costs and assessments have been <br />carefully reviewed, identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the <br />provisions of Article XIHD and 1972 Act. All improvements associated with this <br />District have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly <br />development of the properties within the District to their full potential, consistent <br />with the proposed development plans and applicable portions of the City General <br />Plan. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual <br />property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, <br />servicing, and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of <br />those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the <br />maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the <br />properties. <br />The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that <br />each assessed parcel within the District receives benefit from the improvements. The <br />MuniFinancial page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.