My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2003 AGN JUL 15 I04
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
2003 July 15 Agenda Packet
>
2003 AGN JUL 15 I04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:59:00 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:04:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
inception. <br />However, the City has been informed that at least one business would like its agreement <br />with a hotel to exclude it from the definition of "transient" under this provision. They rely at <br />least in part on the fact that the term "person" includes corporate entities under Section <br />3.24.020(D) and that the term "occupancy" includes the right to the use or possession of a <br />hotel room under Section 3.24.020(B). Their hope is that the TOT should not apply to their <br />agreement with a hotel for more than 30 days, even if that agreement is merely a broker's <br />rate agreement which "blocks" a certain number of rooms, but does not obligate the <br />business to pay for rooms not actually occupied. <br />The language of Section 3.24.020(G) supports the City's interpretation. The exception for <br />a long term stay agreement between the operator and an "occupant" rather than between <br />the operator and "the person" shows that the ordinance is meant to focus on the occupier <br />of the room rather than the "person" who arranges for or pays for the room. The "right to <br />use or possession of a room" also is intended to mean the party that has the key to the <br />room, not a contractual right to register for a room at a certain price. <br />In an effort to clarify any apparent misunderstandings regarding the way in which the City <br />has interpreted and enforced its TOT, the proposed amendments to the TOT ordinance <br />provide clarification on the definition of "transient" under Section 3.24.020(G). The <br />proposed amendments use individual identification as indication of occupancy and <br />specifically mention the intent to tax the individual occupant of the room. <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />Deny adoption of the proposed ordinance and maintain the existing provisions in the <br />Colton Municipal Code regarding transient occupancy tax. <br />2. Direct staff to revise the proposed ordinance pursuant to Council discussion. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br />No financial impact is anticipated because the proposed ordinance merely clarifies the <br />existing provisions of the Colton Municipal Code related to the definition of "transient" <br />and the issuance of refunds regarding the transient occupancy tax. It does not increase <br />or decrease the amount of the City's existing transient occupancy tax. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.