Laserfiche WebLink
inception. <br />However, the City has been informed that at least one business would like its agreement <br />with a hotel to exclude it from the definition of "transient" under this provision. They rely at <br />least in part on the fact that the term "person" includes corporate entities under Section <br />3.24.020(D) and that the term "occupancy" includes the right to the use or possession of a <br />hotel room under Section 3.24.020(B). Their hope is that the TOT should not apply to their <br />agreement with a hotel for more than 30 days, even if that agreement is merely a broker's <br />rate agreement which "blocks" a certain number of rooms, but does not obligate the <br />business to pay for rooms not actually occupied. <br />The language of Section 3.24.020(G) supports the City's interpretation. The exception for <br />a long term stay agreement between the operator and an "occupant" rather than between <br />the operator and "the person" shows that the ordinance is meant to focus on the occupier <br />of the room rather than the "person" who arranges for or pays for the room. The "right to <br />use or possession of a room" also is intended to mean the party that has the key to the <br />room, not a contractual right to register for a room at a certain price. <br />In an effort to clarify any apparent misunderstandings regarding the way in which the City <br />has interpreted and enforced its TOT, the proposed amendments to the TOT ordinance <br />provide clarification on the definition of "transient" under Section 3.24.020(G). The <br />proposed amendments use individual identification as indication of occupancy and <br />specifically mention the intent to tax the individual occupant of the room. <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />Deny adoption of the proposed ordinance and maintain the existing provisions in the <br />Colton Municipal Code regarding transient occupancy tax. <br />2. Direct staff to revise the proposed ordinance pursuant to Council discussion. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br />No financial impact is anticipated because the proposed ordinance merely clarifies the <br />existing provisions of the Colton Municipal Code related to the definition of "transient" <br />and the issuance of refunds regarding the transient occupancy tax. It does not increase <br />or decrease the amount of the City's existing transient occupancy tax. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: <br />