My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2004 AGN MAY 04 I17
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2004
>
2004 May 04 Agenda Packet
>
2004 AGN MAY 04 I17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 12:44:42 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:23:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item #17 <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF May 4, 2004 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: DARYL PARRISH, CITY MANAGER <br />SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO JOIN CITY OF CERRITOS "TRIPLE FLIP" <br />LITIGATION AT NO COST <br />DATE: April 19, 2004 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />In August 2003, the State adopted a budget proposal which redirected substantial <br />amounts of local sales tax, redevelopment tax increment revenue, and the "backfill" <br />portion of local government vehicle license fees ("VLF"), which has been labeled as the <br />"Triple Flip" scenario. The "Triple Flip" uses an estimated $15 billion in debt to "balance" <br />the State budget and proposed to fund that debt with a half -cent statewide sales tax. To <br />obtain support for the proposed sales tax, the Legislature simultaneously reduced the <br />portion of local sales tax given to cities by one half -cent. The Legislature has promised to <br />somehow make up the lost revenue to local governments. Supposedly, the State budget <br />would "backfill" the local sales tax losses with an equal amount of property tax. However, <br />to date the State's promise to make up lost revenue has not been fulfilled and the State's <br />ability to keep such a promise is questionable, at best. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: <br />The City of Cerritos recently requested support from all general law and charter cities for <br />its lawsuit against the State of California to challenge the State's ability to take away sales <br />tax money from local charter cities and, by extension, general law cities. Unlike a request <br />to join as an amicus curiae, the City of Cerritos' request was for all cities to join as co - <br />plaintiffs. General law cities were requested to join in name only, with no financial <br />commitment. Although Cerritos may have amended the complaint to add additional <br />parties by the time Council considers this matter, there may yet be an opportunity for the <br />City to join as a co -plaintiff. <br />Cerritos is concerned that if the "Triple Flip" is implemented, the State would assume <br />control over local sales tax for the first time. In addition to all of the practical and fiscal <br />reasons for opposing this action, the "Triple Flip" is a dangerous precedent that could lead <br />to total State control of local government finances. Furthermore, there is no constitutional <br />protection for local government revenues within the proposed sales -for -property -tax swap. <br />The proposal addresses only the State's needs and places local government revenues at <br />risk in an irresponsible manner. The bottom line is that many cities such as Cerritos are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.