My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2005 AGN MAR 15 I21
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
2005 March 15 Agenda Packet
>
2005 AGN MAR 15 I21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:49:13 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:59:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF COLTON Item #21 <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 15, 2005 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: DILU DE ALWIS, FINANCE DIRECTOR V <br />SUBJECT: BOND CALL — COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 89-2 <br />DATE: March 2, 2005 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On February 22, 1990, the City of Colton (the "City") established Community Facilities District 89-2 <br />(the "CFD"). Further, the City authorized the issuance of bonds not to exceed $9,000,000 of <br />which $3,415,000 bonds were issued for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, expanding or <br />rehabilitating real property other than tangible property with estimated life of five (5) years or more, <br />sewer, water, street, utility and drainage improvement. Property owners within the boundaries of <br />the CFD pay an annual special tax in order to repay the debt. One of the major concerns in the <br />development of the area was drainage. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: <br />In 1999 the original bonds were refunded and some changes were made to the bond documents <br />to enhance their marketability. These changes were necessary due to the level of delinquencies <br />and the concentration of ownership in the CFD. The changes included the elimination of the <br />ability of the City to issue additional bonds up to the maximum of $9 million even though there <br />continued to be a need for drainage improvements. The changes were necessary to market the <br />bonds and be able to provide savings to the property owners in the CFD. At the time of the <br />refinance, there were funds in the Construction account that were earmarked for addressing the <br />drainage problems. The funds were carried over to the new bond issue because the <br />improvements were not completed. A provision was made in the new bond issue to allow bonds to <br />be retired early with the proceeds of delinquent property taxes. On September 1, 2001, the City <br />called $185,000 worth of outstanding bonds with funds collected from delinquent Special Taxes <br />resulting in annual debt service savings of $11,028 for the remainder of the bond term. <br />The City did not use bond proceeds nor earnings in the Improvement Fund to reduce the bond <br />size in 2001 but funds collected from delinquent taxes in the CFD in order to have some funds to <br />use for the 3-5 Storm Drain Project. <br />As of January 30, 2005, the amount of funds being held by Union Bank, the fiscal agent, in the <br />Improvement Fund was $818,709. After successful lobbying in Washington by the City Council <br />and Management, the City has secured additional funds to start work on the 3-5 Storm Drain <br />Project. $387,055 has been encumbered to fund the design of the project. City Management has <br />allocated $459,000 out of the Improvement Fund for the first phase of this project. Phase I of the <br />project will begin in January 2006. Efforts are in progress to secure additional funding and to use <br />the remainder of funds in the Improvement Fund for a matching grant. <br />The delay in completion of the drainage improvements was caused by a number of factors. One <br />factor was the delay in the build out of CFD 89-2 because of the Delhi Sands Fly that was found in <br />the boundaries of the CFD. This delayed the development and the issuance of the remainder of <br />the bond authorization. Because of this delay, it was necessary for the City to seek alternative <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.