Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />CLOSED SESSION - COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/COLTON UTILITY AUTHORITY <br />FEBRUARY 1, 2005 <br />In accordance with notice duly and legally given, a Regular Meeting was held on the above <br />given date at 5:10 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, with Mayor Bennett presiding. <br />CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL <br />Councilmembers present were, Hernandez, De La Rosa, Chastain, Ramos Mitchell Suchil, and <br />Mayor Bennett. <br />City Attorney Dedeth announced that the City Council would meet in Closed Session to discuss <br />the following items: <br />CLOSED _�jESS I C�N- <br />A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION <br />Pursuant Government Code Section 54956.9(a) <br />Name of Case: City of Colton v. Alan Steward, et al. <br />Case Number: San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. SCV 87040 <br />B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION <br />Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) <br />Name of Case: Olga Ulloa v. Kimberly R. Jacobson, Douqlas Jacobson, City of Colton <br />Case Number: San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 120733 <br />C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION <br />Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) <br />Name of Case: Graciela Razon, City of Colton. et al., <br />Case Number: San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 110974 <br />D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION <br />Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) <br />Name of Case: gDemond Sanders v. Ismael Chavez, Jr., et al. <br />Case Number: San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 107544 <br />E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION <br />Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) <br />Name of Case: William Roth v. City of Colton <br />Case Number: Sari Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 115223 <br />F. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION <br />Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) <br />Number of Cases: I Potential Case <br />City Attorney Derleth announced that he would recuse himself from discussion of Item E due to <br />Conflict of Interest as BB&K represents other parties involved in the transaction and adjourned <br />the meeting to Closed Session at 5:05 p.m. and at 6:04 p.m.; the meeting reconvened with all <br />members present as heretofore. <br />2005 FEBRUARY 01 REG CC/RDA/CUA-M-EETING - 1 - <br />