Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R-85-06 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />COLTON DENYING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING AND <br />UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF <br />AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT TO (1) PERMIT THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION <br />OF A METAL SHREDDER AS AN EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING <br />SCRAP METAL FACILITY; (2) PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF AN APPROXIMATE 30' X 250' METAL BUILDING AND <br />RELATED FACILITIES; (3) PERMIT AN INCREASE IN THE <br />VOLUME OF RAILROAD TRANSLOADING OCCURRING ON <br />PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 785 EAST M STREET; <br />AND (4) APPROVE A MAJOR VARIANCE TO PERMIT <br />CONSTRUCTION OF AN OVER HEIGHT WALL ON THE <br />SOUTHERLY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY: FILE INDEX NO. <br />D-55-01 <br />WHEREAS, an application was filed by Pacific Rail Industries to amend an <br />approved conditional use permit for the purpose of permitting (1) the installation and operation of <br />a metal shredder as an expansion to an existing scrap metal facility; (2) the construction of an <br />approximate 30' X 250" metal building; (3) an increase in the volume of railroad transloading; <br />and (4) a major variance to permit the construction of an overheight wall (south property line) <br />(collectively, the "Applications" or "Project") on property generally located at 785 East M Street <br />("Subject Site"); and <br />WHEREAS, the Applications were previously considered by the City of Colton <br />Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") on March 9, 2004, March 23, 2004, August 24, <br />2004, September 28, 2004, and October 12, 2004, at which time the Planning Commission <br />conducted duly noticed public hearing workshops and public hearings on the Applications, all <br />persons wishing to testify in connection with the proposed Applications were heard, and the <br />Applications were comprehensively reviewed; and <br />WHEREAS, an environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared and made <br />available for public review for a total of 59 days; and <br />-1- <br />