My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN JUN 21 I29
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 June 21 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN JUN 21 I29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:30:50 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:39:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REPORT <br />City Council Meeting <br />May 31, 1994 <br />the contract is greater than 18 months, the maximum cash settlement shall be an amount <br />equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 18. <br />(b) The cash settlement formula described in subdivision (a) is a cap or maximum <br />ceiling on the amounts that may be paid by as local agency employer to an employee and <br />shall not be construed as a target or example of the amount of the cash settlement to be <br />paid by a local agency employer to an employee in all contract termination cases." <br />(Government Code Section 53620) <br />Thus, any contract with a new City Manager may provide up to the maximum cash <br />settlement amount permitted by statute. <br />The current City Manager ordinance permits termination without additional compensation <br />of the City Manager for any reason if a unanimous vote to terminate occurs. It permits <br />termination without additional compensation for any reason after notice and hearing with a <br />simple majority vote. As an alternative to a cash settlement provision in a contract with the City <br />Manager, the Council may wish to submit an amendment to the City Manager Ordinance to the <br />electorate that requires a "super majority" vote for termination. The Council could propose <br />amending the City Manager Ordinance so that five or six votes are required for termination. <br />This would give a City Manager a sense of security and independence from the political shifts <br />that tend to occur on the Council without exposing the City to liability for termination <br />compensation. <br />Alternatively, the Council could submit a proposal to amend the City Manager's <br />Ordinance by permitting the Council to establish the terms of employment and termination on <br />a case by case basis. Such an amendment would also require approval by the electorate. <br />In short, there are any number of possible approaches to changing the way in which the <br />City deals with City Managers. Only a few issues have been considered here. It might be <br />advisable, if the Council wishes to proceed to consider changes such as those outlined in this <br />report, or others yet to be contemplated, to establish a subcommittee to recommend particular <br />contract provisions or amendments to the City Manager Ordinance. There is still time to place <br />any ordinance amendments on the November ballot, if the Council moves forward quickly. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />If the City Council wishes to develop contractual terms for the employment of the City <br />Manager, or if the Council wishes to amend the City Manager Ordinance to permit more <br />flexibility in the employment of the City Manager, it should direct staff to prepare a contract for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.