My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1978 ADJ MTG MIN JUN 13
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Minutes
>
1971-1980
>
1978
>
1978 ADJ MTG MIN JUN 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 5:10:30 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 6:31:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In -Lieu Taxes <br />This charge has -traditionally been comprised of -two parts: <br />(A) A franchise fee of 3% of gross revenues. <br />(B) A property tax on assessed valuation utilizing the current <br />tax rate. <br />I propose the franchise fee be reduced -to 2%, since that is -the rate <br />charged to Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas <br />Companies. This will cause a reduction in revenue to the General <br />Fund in the amount of $46,500. Because of -the passage of Proposi- <br />tion 13 on June 6, 1978, -the maximum property -tax -that can be levied <br />is 1% of market value. I realize this limitation would, under pri- <br />vate industry circumstances, be allocated -to other county agencies, <br />however, we should apply comparable costs -to -the Enterprises if we <br />are to determine -that they are self-supporting and not relying on <br />General Fund support. This change in property taxation will result <br />in an additional $150,680 -to the General Fund. <br />By utilizing the cost accounting formula for administration and <br />collection costs, a more realistic rate for franchise fees, and -the <br />property tax limitation provided by law, -the General Fund will be <br />reimbursed an additional $131,915 by the Enterprise funds for support <br />services. The following reflects these additional costs to -the <br />Enterprises by Fund: <br />Sewer Increase <br />Electric Water Treatment & Refuse to <br />Utility Utility Collection Collection Gen. Fund <br />Increase(Decrease) $(37,635) $44, 525 $85,850 $39,175 $131,915 <br />This reassessment of methods used for charges will not directly cause <br />an increase in utility rates, however, the deficits of these Enter- <br />prise Funds will not be eliminated as soon as previously anticipated. <br />THOMAS J. CALABRESE /s/ <br />City Manager <br />TJC:mer <br />Atch . <br />Object or Departments <br />Travel & meetings <br />Dues & publications <br />Overtime <br />Curb & gutters <br />Parks Maintenance` <br />Street Trees <br />Recreation <br />Library <br />Traffic Signs <br />Traffic Striping <br />Planning Department <br />ALTERNATIVE A <br />Proposed Decreases <br />$21,355 (50 of budget) <br />$ 4, 850 (50% of budget) <br />$49, 970 (50% of budget) <br />$46,010 <br />100% <br />$11,105 <br />4% <br />$104,595 <br />1000/. <br />$21,395 <br />46/0 <br />$79,088 <br />44% <br />$12,210 <br />50% <br />$15,092 <br />50% <br />$13,875 <br />17% <br />The above alternative would encompass a layoff of 13.5 persons and <br />possibly would affect -the majority of CETA employees which would <br />number approximately 64 - <br />AN UN 1 3 1978 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.