Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R -76A-18 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />COLTON, CALIFORNIA TO SUMMARILY VACATE A PORTION <br />OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG E STREET AND H STREET <br />LOCATED ON THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE <br />RAILWAY COMPANY ("BNSF"), PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA <br />STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8330, ET SEQ. <br />WHEREAS, the California Streets and Highways Code provides that an excess right-of-way of a <br />street or highway may be summarily vacated if certain conditions are met; and <br />WHEREAS, the City of Colton ("City") holds a right-of-way for street and public utility purposes <br />over, under and upon that Portion of E Street and H Street located on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe <br />Railway Company (`BNSF") (hereinafter references as "Portion of E Street and H Street'); and <br />WHEREAS, there are existing public utilities and easements for public utilities in the Vacated <br />Area and appurtenant rights thereto that will be reserved for the City in accordance with California Streets <br />and Highways Code Section 8340; and <br />WHEREAS, the excess right-of-way described herein is not required for street or highway <br />purposes; and <br />WHEREAS, this summary vacation is made pursuant to the California Streets and Highways <br />Code, Division 9, Part 3 (sections 8300 et seq.), Chapter 4 — Summary Vacation. <br />WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON DOES <br />HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 1. Incomoration of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the <br />recitals of this Resolution are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution. <br />SECTION 2. Findings. The City Council further finds that: <br />(a) The subject excess right-of-way to be vacated is not required for present or prospective <br />public use, either for street or highway purposes or for any other public circulation use such as pedestrian, <br />bikeway, or other non -motorized transportation access. <br />(b) The subject excess right-of-way has not been used for the purpose for which it was <br />acquired. <br />(c) Those properties adjoining the excess right-of-way to be vacated will continue <br />to have access. <br />(d) The legal description and plat map are technically correct and in compliance with the <br />aforementioned sections of the California Streets and Highways Code and other applicable State and local <br />laws. <br />