Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />UORIOIXIII181N 81 I&*2M <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON <br />UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION DENYING THE <br />APPEAL AND, UPHOLDING THE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION THAT A <br />PALLET MANUFACTURING AND STORAGE USE DOES NOT AUTHORIZE <br />A CONTRACTOR'S STORAGE YARD AS A STAND-ALONE USE AS PART <br />OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (FILE INDEX NUMBER DCV -77-01) ON <br />PROPERTY LOCATED AT 240 E. CONGRESS STREET LOCATED IN THE <br />M-1/SDA (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA <br />OVERLAY) ZONE FOR FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP -001-207 <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colton did hold a Public Hearing for File <br />Index Number DAP -001-207 on April 7, 2015, to consider the applicant's Appeal of Director's <br />Determination regarding whether or not a pallet manufacturing and storage use authorizes a <br />contractor's storage yard as a stand-alone use as part of Conditional Use Permit (DCV -77-01) at <br />240 E. Congress Street located in the M-1/SDA (Light Industrial/Sensitive Development Area <br />Overlay) Zone; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act <br />("CEQA"), a General Exemption. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), "the <br />activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the <br />potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty <br />that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the <br />environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA." <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Colton <br />that the determination of the Development Services Director regarding the Appealed Decision <br />was correct and be it further resolved that the City Council hereby denies the appeal and <br />reaffirms the Planning Commission's Decision and the Director's determination. <br />SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and oral <br />evidence presented, including the staff reports, and the findings made in this Resolution, the City <br />Council hereby denies the Appeal and upholds the decision of the Planning Commission <br />upholding the Director's determination that a contractor storage yard was not authorized as a <br />stand-alone use as part of the approval of pallet manufacturing and storage use approved as part <br />of Conditional Use Permit (DCV -77-01) on property located at 240 E. Congress Street located in <br />