Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17' <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R-19-14 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON <br />DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT (FILE INDEX NO: DAP -001-099) FOR THE OPERATION OF A <br />CONCRETE CONTRACTORS' STORAGE YARD ON AN EXISTING 7.6 - <br />ACRE DEVELOPED SITE LOCATED AT 240 E. CONGRESS STREET ZONED <br />M-1/SDA — LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA <br />OVERLAY (APPEAL FILE INDEX NO: DAP -001-108). <br />WHEREAS, Largo Concrete, Inc. ("Applicant") filed an application (File No. DAP - <br />001 -108) requesting the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's decision to allow a <br />concrete contractors' storage yard on an existing 7.6 acre developed site located at 240 E. <br />Congress Street legally described as Assessor Parcel Numbers 0163-391-11 (hereinafter <br />"Subject Property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the General Plan designation of the Project Site is designated on the <br />General Plan Land Use Map as Light Industrial and zoned M-1/SDA — Light <br />Industrial/Sensitive Development Area Overlay zone; and <br />WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed <br />public hearing on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection <br />with the proposed Application were heard, and the Application was comprehensively reviewed <br />and concerns were raised by the public and adjacent property owners such that the Planning <br />Commission closed the public hearing and voted not to accept the resolution for approval and <br />for staff to return in two weeks, August 13, 2013, with a new resolution with the intent to <br />deny; and <br />WHEREAS, On August 13, 2013, following considerable discussion regarding the <br />Project, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1, with 1 abstention and 1 absence to deny the <br />Project by adopting Resolution Number R-15-13; and <br />WHEREAS, a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's denial was received by the <br />City Clerk ("Appeal"); and <br />WHEREAS, on March 4, 2014, the City Council of the City ("City Council") <br />conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Appeal at which time all persons wishing to <br />R-19-14 page 1 <br />