Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />WHEREAS, Concerns about non-medical marijuana use in connection with medical <br />marijuana distribution operations have been recognized by federal and state courts. One <br />example is People v. Leal, (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 829. ("Not surprisingly, it seems that the <br />enhanced protection from arrest has proven irresistible to those illegally trafficking marijuana, <br />for if there is even rough accuracy in the anecdotal estimate by the arresting detective in this <br />case — that nearly 90 percent of those arrested for marijuana sales possess either a CUA <br />recommendation or a card — then there is obviously widespread abuse of the CUA and the <br />MMP identification card scheme by illicit sellers of marijuana. Ninety percent far exceeds the <br />proportion of legitimate medical marijuana users one would expect to find in the populace at <br />large. For this and other reasons, it is impossible for us not to recognize that many citizens, <br />judges undoubtedly among them, believe the CUA has become a charade enabling the use of <br />marijuana much more commonly for recreational than for genuine medical uses."); and <br />WHEREAS, Despite the CUA and the MMP, the United States Attorneys in <br />California have taken action to enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against <br />marijuana dispensaries, and have issued letters stating that California cities and officials face <br />possible criminal prosecution for enabling dispensaries to violation federal law; and <br />WHEREAS, The failure to expressly prohibit mobile marijuana dispensaries or <br />medical marijuana dispensaries will expose the City to costs related to regulation, <br />enforcement, and the negative secondary effects of dispensaries including an increase in <br />violent crime; and <br />WHEREAS, the City's current prohibition of MMDs in the CMC does not expressly <br />define the term Medical Marijuana Dispensaries or include in such definition facilities or <br />offices that handle or process the paperwork for joining a medical marijuana dispensary or <br />medical marijuana cooperative, receive any financial compensation or donation for the <br />marijuana, or give vouchers or other indicia of membership to new members of these MMDs <br />or expressly reference by name mobile or off-site delivery of marijuana independent from <br />these facilities or offices; and <br />WHEREAS, the City now wishes to expressly define the term Medical Marijuana <br />Dispensaries and expressly prohibit the use of any buildings, structures and land in the City <br />for a Medical Marijuana Dispensary as defined herein; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Urgency Ordinance, and the regulations <br />set forth herein, are necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety in <br />order to clarify that the City's ban of MMDs includes and encompasses facilities or offices <br />that handle or process the paperwork for joining a medical marijuana dispensary or medical <br />marijuana cooperative, receive financial contributions or donations for the marijuana, or give <br />vouchers or other indicia of membership to individuals, regardless of whether marijuana is <br />ultimately dispensed from the location or a mobile or off-site delivery source independent of <br />the facility or location, as well as the dispensing or delivery of marijuana from mobile or off- <br />site delivery sources independent from these offices or facilities; and <br />NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, <br />CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br />