My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-006-12 - Amend Title 18 Relating to Signs - Adopted 6.19.12
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Ordinances
>
2000s
>
2011-2021
>
2012
>
O-006-12 - Amend Title 18 Relating to Signs - Adopted 6.19.12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2020 4:58:46 PM
Creation date
11/11/2020 4:57:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C! <br />0 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />F. Timely Decision. At each level of review or appeal, the decision shall be <br />rendered, in writing, within the following time limits. The time period <br />begins running when the application is deemed complete, or the notice of <br />appeal has been filed, whichever applies. <br />Upon receipt of a completed sign review application by the <br />development services director, the director shall approve, deny, or <br />refer the application to the design review committee within thirty <br />calendar days. <br />2. Upon receipt of a completed sign review application by the design <br />review committee, the committee shall approve, deny, or refer the <br />application to the planning commission within thirty calendar days. <br />3. Notwithstanding the time limits imposed by this section, the <br />department and the applicant may mutually agree to an extension of <br />the time limits. Such extension shall be in writing and shall be for <br />no more than ninety days. <br />4. Should the director and/or the committee fail to render a decision <br />on a sign application within the prescribed time limits established <br />by this section, such sign application shall be deemed automatically <br />appealed to the planning commission to the extent it complies with <br />the area and location requirements for signs imposed by this <br />chapter. <br />5. Notwithstanding any of the time limits contained in this section, the <br />development services director and design review committee shall <br />endeavor to render decisions in a timely manner. <br />G. Variances. Applications for a variance from the terms of this title shall be <br />reviewed by the planning commission according to the variance procedures <br />as set forth in this title, except for deviations up to 20% of that standard for <br />letter height, maximum sign area, maximum sign height, or separation <br />between signs may be allowed with the concurrent approval of a minor <br />sign variance by the same approving authority for the sign, when it is found <br />that the deviation is necessary to improve the effectiveness of the purpose <br />of the sign. <br />H. Appeals. <br />Unless otherwise specified herein, a decision of the development <br />services director or design review committee may be appealed by <br />the applicant or any interested person within fifteen days of the <br />decision to the planning commission. The appeal shall be made on <br />the forms prescribed by the planning division and fees shall be paid <br />in accordance with the fee resolution adopted by the city council. <br />Automatic appeals made pursuant to subsection (F)(4) of this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.