Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R-11-22 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, <br />CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE "BRAND-HUANG- <br />MENDOZA TRIPARTISAN LAND USE INITIATIVE" TO AMEND ARTICLE XI <br />OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO MAKE <br />ZONING AND LAND USE COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, AND NOT OF STATE <br />INTEREST <br />WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California in recent years has proposed, <br />passed, and signed into law a number of bills addressing a range of land use planning and <br />housing issues; and <br />WHEREAS, the majority of these bills usurp the authority of local jurisdictions to <br />determine for themselves the land use policies and practices that best suit each city and its <br />residents and instead impose "one -size -fits -all" mandates that do not take into account the <br />unique needs and differences of local jurisdictions throughout the State of California; and <br />WHEREAS, the majority of these bills do not provide any incentives or requirements <br />for low-income affordable or moderate income workforce housing, but instead impose new <br />policies that will incentivize speculation and result in the addition of market -rate or luxury <br />housing, thereby eliminating the opportunity for local jurisdictions to implement effective <br />policies that will create more affordable housing and affirmatively further fair housing <br />practices; and <br />WHEREAS, the ability of local jurisdictions to determine for themselves which <br />projects require review beyond ministerial approval; what parking requirements are <br />appropriate for various neighborhoods; what housing plans and programs are suitable and <br />practical for each community; and what zoning should be allowed for residential properties, <br />rather than having these decisions imposed upon cities without regard for the unique <br />circumstances and needs of each individual community, is a matter of critical importance to <br />the City of COLTON and many other municipalities focused on local zoning and housing <br />issues; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of COLTON hereby determines that local <br />government entities are best able to assess and respond to the unique needs of their <br />respective communities and hereby objects to the proliferation of State legislation (including <br />SB 9 and SB 10) that would deprive us of that ability. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of COLTON, CALIFORNIA, DOES <br />HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of COLTON is opposed to the <br />Legislature of the State of California continually proposing and adopting legislation that <br />overrides the zoning and land use authority of local government and inhibits the ability of <br />local government to effectively plan for and implement policies to stimulate the efficient <br />production of affordable housing in the City of COLTON. <br />2 <br />