Laserfiche WebLink
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF COLTON ITEM #22 <br />Agency Board Meeting of December 20, 2005 <br />TO: Honorable Chairperson and Boardmembers <br />FROM: Candace E. Cassel, Economic Development Director <br />SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Agency Resolution No. 849 <br />Adopting a Replacement Housing Plan <br />DATE: December 5, 2005 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA), dated July 18, 1989, between <br />the Redevelopment Agency, Cooperative Services, Inc. (CSI) as the agent, and Colton <br />Nonprofit Senior Housing, Inc. (Colton Non -Profit) as the owner, the Colton Non -Profit <br />entered into a contract with Turner Construction to build the 101 -unit Colton Palms Senior <br />Housing which was completed on August 6, 1991. <br />In 1997, the building began to exhibit problems with the exterior cladding or "skin." Given <br />the Agency's relationship to the project and it's obligation at that time to fund any debt <br />service, it agreed to be a party to litigation against the contractor and architect. In 1999, <br />Colton Non -Profit and the Agency initiated litigation against Turner Construction and Valerio <br />Architects. <br />A claim against Valerio Architects was settled and final payment of $247,519.48 was <br />received by the Agency in February 2002. In early 2003 the lawsuit with Turner <br />Construction was settled with payment of $5,500,000 to Colton Non -Profit and the Agency. <br />The Turner Settlement Funds were deposited into an interest bearing client trust account of <br />the law firm of Best Best & Krieger LLP ("BB&K"). <br />On April 5, 2004, the Agency and the City filed an action against Colton Non -Profit in the <br />Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino (the "Court"), entitled <br />Redevelopment Agency for the City of Colton v. Colton Non -Profit Senior Housing, Inc., Case <br />No. SCV SS114148 (the "Agency's Action") to determine (1) ownership and control of Colton <br />Palms, and (2) ownership of the Turner Settlement Funds and earned interest. On July 13, <br />2004, the Agency filed an amended complaint (the "Amended Complaint") asserting an <br />additional claim for breach of contract and seeking specific performance of its purported right <br />to purchase Colton Palms pursuant to an option provision in the Disposition and <br />Development Agreement dated July 18, 1989. <br />On May 19, 2004, Colton Non -Profit filed a separate action against the City and the Agency <br />entitled Colton Non -Profit Senior Housing, Inc. v. City of Colton, et al., Case No. SCV <br />SS115619 (the "Colton Non -Profit Action"). <br />Over the past 1 % years, the parties have been engaged in mediation as an attempt to settle <br />the dispute over the building, its future and the settlement funds. Although Relocation <br />pursuant to California Redevelopment Law and construction of an alternative facility were <br />offered, it was ultimately rejected by Colton Non -Profit in lieu of an alternative settlement. <br />R:\Administration\Meetings\2005 MEETINGS\December 20, 2005\Replacement Housing Plan Staff Report Delmar rev 121505.doc <br />