My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN NOV 15 I22A
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 November 15 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN NOV 15 I22A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 10:34:51 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For Council Meeting of November 15, 1994 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Manager <br />FROM: Thomas K. Clarke, Electric Utility Director Date: 11/9/94 <br />SUBJECT: CONSIDER FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY <br />COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, <br />APPROVING THE ENTERING INTO OF A LEASEBACK <br />AGREEMENT (ELECTRIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS) <br />BACKGROUND <br />The Colton Electric Utility is proposing to issue electric revenue bonds through the Colton Public <br />Financing Authority for needed improvements to the electric system. Even though the Authority <br />will be the issuer of the debt, the payment for debt service will come from electric sales revenues. <br />In order to assign the payment obligation to the Electric Utility, a leaseback agreement between the <br />Authority and the Utility will be established in an Installment Purchase Agreement. <br />STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM <br />The Electric Utility is not empowered to issue debt on its own. However, the formation of the <br />Colton Public Financing Authority creates a vehicle whereby the Authority may issue debt on <br />behalf of the City of Colton, or the Electric Utility in this instance. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Since there is nothing in place which currently allows the Electric Utility to issue long-term debt, <br />the only existing alternative would be to raise electric rates in a sufficient amount to provide funds <br />for the projected construction projects of the Utility. This would result in a substantial rate <br />revision. In addition, increasing rates to current customers would violate the principal of having <br />ratepayers pay for the benefits of the system improvements. The benefits of the work will accrue <br />over the ensuing 30 years. It is over this period that the benefits should be paid for. <br />Page 1 of 2 Item No. 22 A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.