My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1999 AGN JUL 20 I16
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1999
>
1999 July 20 Agenda Packet
>
1999 AGN JUL 20 I16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 9:54:43 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:31:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF July 20, 1999 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />APPROVAL: Henry T. Garcia, City Manager <br />FROM: City Attorney <br />SUBJECT: Request for Amicus Curiae Support in Tahoe -Sierra Preservation <br />Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency <br />DATE: July 20, 1999 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />From time to time, public agencies seek the City's support as an amicus curiae (a friend <br />of the court). There is no cost to the City to participate as an amicus curiae. The <br />Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) is seeking support in the case described below <br />which concerns land use issues. <br />DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS: <br />The Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, amended by Congress in 1980, mandated the <br />adoption of a regional plan for the Tahoe Basin. While TRPA was in the process of <br />developing its regional plan, it adopted a moratorium on the development of <br />environmentally sensitive lands. The moratorium was necessary to prevent development <br />in the area from undermining the objectives of the regional plan before it could be enacted <br />and implemented. Property owners challenged the moratorium and the District Court <br />found that the moratorium resulted in a temporary taking. <br />The TRPA's appeal is important to all government agencies involved in land use and <br />natural resource regulation. If the District Court's opinion is upheld, public agencies would <br />be left vulnerable to similar court challenges for adopting planning and development <br />moratoria during the planning process. <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />1. Direct the City Attorney to advise the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency to list the <br />City of Colton as a supporter of the amicus curiae brief. <br />2. Take no action. <br />RVPUB\NGS\520099 <br />Item #16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.