My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2002 AGN JUL 16 I15
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2002
>
2002 July 16 Agenda Packet
>
2002 AGN JUL 16 I15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 3:50:21 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:14:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
^%Xr.TVW^ RCr<IVM I <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF JOY 16, 2002 <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />A: City Attorney <br />�EGT: Amendment to Engineering, Procurement and <br />Agreement for Power Generation Project with <br />DATE: July 16, 2002 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />During the City Council Meeting on May 21, 2002, the Electric Utilityf <br />enter into an Engineering, Procurement And Construction Agreei <br />Generation Project with Moresco: The Agreement provides for 'd <br />generating facility with a nominal capacity rating not to exceed 49 mega <br />needs of the City of Cotton Electric Utility. <br />DISC U SSIONtANALYS I5: <br />Following execution of the Agreement, it became evident that certa <br />activities in the Agreement should be amended to reflect the circumsta <br />the Project. As a result, an Amendment to the Agreement has been di <br />Item #'15 <br />authorized to <br />t For Power <br />cpment of a <br />is to meet the <br />deadlines and <br />9s surrounding <br />The Agreement provides that the City is required to pursue a validation proceeding in court <br />to validate the Agreement against a future challenge. However, upon implementation of <br />the Agreement, it became evident that the time required for such a proceeding would be <br />in conflict with procedures and deadlines for successfully issuing the bonds for financing <br />the Project. As aresult, the Amendment would remove the obligation for a validation <br />proceeding. <br />The Amendment would also revise some of the prices for certain phases of the Project. <br />However, such revisions would not increase the total price for the Project. As a result of <br />changes to the timing for certain tasks, the Amendment would include a revised schedule <br />for completion of the Project. The new target date for completion would be May 15, 2003. <br />The Amendment would also include other changes to clarify some of the obligations <br />between the parties. <br />ALTERNATIVES; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.