My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2003 AGN JUN 17 Closed Session C
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
2003 June 17 Agenda Packet
>
2003 AGN JUN 17 Closed Session C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 12:48:39 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:03:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made by and among the City of <br />Azusa ("Azusa"), City of Banning (`Banning"), City of Colton ("Colton") (collectively, <br />"Cities" and individually a "City") and Southern California Edison Company ("SCE") <br />(collectively, "Parties"), effective as of the latest date of execution by each of the Parties, <br />with respect to the following facts: <br />RECITALS <br />A. Azusa and SCE entered into the Edison -Azusa Restructuring Agreement <br />in or about November 1997 (the "Azusa Restructuring Agreement"). <br />B. Banning and SCE entered into the Edison -Banning Restructuring <br />Agreement in or about November 1997 (the "Banning Restructuring Agreement"). <br />C. Colton and SCE entered into the Edison -Colton Restructuring Agreement <br />in or about November 1997 (the "Colton Restructuring Agreement"). <br />D. The Azusa, Banning and Colton Restructuring Agreements (collectively, <br />"Restructuring Agreements"), implemented a new set of arrangements to facilitate both <br />SCE's and Cities' entry into the new marketplace. Paragraph 6.4.1 of the Restructuring <br />Agreements, which expired December 31, 2000, sets forth provisions for determining the <br />amounts billable to SCE by Cities for ancillary services. <br />E. In or about September 9, 2002, SCE commenced an action in the Los <br />Angeles County Superior Court, entitled Southern California Edison Company v. City of <br />Azusa, City of Banning, City of Colton, Case No. BC281408 ("the Action"), seeking to <br />recover amounts SCE claimed it was overcharged because Cities had invoiced and SCE <br />had paid more than was due for ancillary services for Operating Reserves pursuant to the <br />terms of Section 6.4.1 of the Restructuring Agreements and because Azusa and Colton <br />billed SCE for some Ancillary Services based on prices other than the California <br />Independent System Operator Corporation ("ISO") Day -Ahead market prices and seeking <br />a declaration regarding SCE's audit rights under the Restructuring Agreements. <br />F. It is the Parties' mutual desire that the Action be resolved by this <br />Agreement without further expenditure of time and litigation expense. <br />G. The Parties wish to document and formalize their agreement and provide <br />for the payment to SCE of the amounts agreed to be due. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and among the Parties as follows: <br />1. For the service period April 1998 through December 2000, SCE and Cities <br />resolve, settle and compromise all disputes and claims regarding SCE's and Cities' <br />obligations relating to the calculation of spinning and non -spinning operating reserves as <br />-1- <br />LW031260038 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.