My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2005 AGN NOV 01 I14
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
2005 November 01 Agenda Packet
>
2005 AGN NOV 01 I14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 12:41:49 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:37:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ITEM #14 <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 01, 2005 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members <br />FROM: Jeannette Olko, Electric Utility General Manager <br />SUBJECT: Request to Set Public Hearing for Electric Rate Increase <br />DATE: October 24, 2005 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On January 18, 2005, the City Council approved the award of a contract to Navigant Consulting, <br />Inc. to perform a cost-of-service/rate design study for the electric utility. The purpose of the study <br />was to determine if the existing rate structure was appropriate given the current cost structure, <br />and to recommend new rates, if necessary, that are equitable, fair, nondiscriminatory, based on <br />the cost of providing service, produce sufficient revenues to meet revenue requirements, and <br />provide overall rate stability for the utility. <br />DISCUSSI ONIANALYSIS: <br />A joint workshop with the City Council was held on September 13, 2005, that offered a short <br />course on electric utility revenue requirements and developing electric rates, and presented the <br />results of the cost -of -service study. The results show that the current rate structure does not allow <br />the electric utility to fully recover its revenue requirement; in fact, the electric utility is projected to <br />under -collect its revenue requirement by $2.66 million for fiscal year 2005-2006. No customer <br />class (residential, commercial, or industrial) is paying their fully allocated net revenue requirement <br />from a cost causation perspective. Therefore an average 8.35% electric rate increase was <br />recommended to collect the $2.66 million shortfall. If the recommended increase is not approved, <br />there are a number of potential consequences to consider: (1) increased risk of degradation of <br />system reliability; (2) reduced service levels; (3) increase in the number of forced outages at Agua <br />Mansa Power Plant; (4) no operating reserves to fund necessary repairs in the case of a system <br />emergency; (5) downgrading of electric utility bond rating. It was also discussed that while the <br />utility continues to cut operating expenses as much as possible, because power costs continue to <br />rise coupled with the fact that these costs account for over 50% of the utility's budget, the rate <br />increase is necessary. <br />With the proposed rate increase, Colton Electric Utility rates are still below Southern California <br />Edison's rates. Southern California Edison has recently asked for an additional 8% increase to <br />their rates because of rising natural gas prices. This 8% increase is in addition to the 3% increase <br />it asked for earlier this year, and it did not rule out further increases if the price ofnatural gas <br />continues to climb. <br />The rate developed for residential customers took into consideration concerns expressed during <br />the workshop regarding low-income residential customers. There is no change proposed for the <br />first 250 kWh of consumption. Any consumption over the initial 250 kWh is being increased <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.