My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1991 AGN FEB 05 I27
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1991
>
1991 February 05 Agenda Packet
>
1991 AGN FEB 05 I27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 4:45:16 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL Q <br />FOR: Council Meeting of 5 February 1991 �± <br />FROM: Jaime R. Aguilera, Director of Community Development 4s/ G <br />SUBJECT: Letter by Wyatt Construction regarding TT 15102 <br />xtlffeltmLkg <br />Mr. Wyatt has submitted a request (attached) which indicates that he is requesting N <br />clarification as to the Council's action regarding Tentative Tract 15102. On December 18, <br />1990, the City Council discussed the project and there was discussion regarding amend- <br />ments to Mr. Wyatt's plans. The Council eventually voted to deny the plan, however, it <br />was unclear if the Council also wished to allow Mr. Wyatt to amend the plan for D <br />reconsideration. <br />ALTERNATIVES: A <br />#1 If the intent was to allow Mr. Wyatt to resubmit the plans with amendments, <br />then Mr. Wyatt could do so without once again paying all pertinent fees, <br />amounting to approximately $1,110.00. <br />#2 If the intent was to deny Tentative Tract 15102 with no other stipulation, R <br />then Mr. Wyatt will have to pay all fees again, if he wishes reconsideration. <br />ANALYSIS: E <br />It has been the case in the past that either the Council or the Commission will deny a project <br />but concurrently allow a resubmittal for further consideration. It has also been the case in <br />the past that the Council or Commission will simply deny a project without further <br />stipulations. The Council has the ability to interpret their decision in favor of either <br />alternative one or alternative two. <br />Staff believes that the project could answer the concerns of the opposing residents with <br />some modifications, if it was allowed to be resubmitted. <br />11 <br />T <br />Agenda Report 6490A PAGE 1 OF 2 <br />a1 �G s N i ZAL RECORDS A7 <br />ORIGIN"'� is�03:_ .......... <br />»...�.�. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.