Laserfiche WebLink
Item #21 <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF May 18, 2004 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Colton Recreation and Parks Commission <br />SUBJECT: Recommend Approval of City's First Park Master Plan <br />DATE: May 12, 2004 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On December 18, 2001, the City Council approved the development of the City's first Park Master <br />Plan. The landscape architectural firm of Richard Fisher Associates was eventually hired to <br />prepare the plan. After more than one year of research and development, a master plan draft was <br />brought before the Commission during three separate meetings. On March 17, 2004 the <br />Commission approved the document. <br />DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: <br />The Park Master Plan represents approximately 12 months of on-site visits, resident, Council and <br />staff interviews, three Recreation & Parks Commission reviews, two community meetings, surveys <br />and input from Colton youth sports groups. It is a "living, breathing" document that can be revised <br />as time goes along. It is a "road map" that can be followed into the future. <br />The Master Plan provides a proposed detailed design for each of the City's 12 parks. It also <br />includes interview information, a current inventory of each park and several surveys. During the <br />Commission's review of the document with the consultant, questions were asked and a number of <br />recommended changes were made. The Commission then requested and met with the City <br />Council on April 27, 2004 for a joint workshop to review the document. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br />Approval of the Master Plan will not create, within itself, a financial impact. However, the City <br />currently has approximately $450,000 in grant funds encumbered with the State of California for <br />future park improvement projects. These funds are a part of State Propositions 12 and 40. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: <br />No environmental impacts are anticipated from the City Council's approval of the Master Plan <br />because it is a conceptual design and does not propose any specific park improvement projects. <br />The Master Plan may be used as a conceptual guide for development of future park improvement <br />projects. Those future projects will each be individually subject to evaluation for potential <br />environmental impacts, according to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act <br />("CEQA') (Pub. Resources Code § 21000 et seq.). Because the Master Plan itself is a conceptual <br />