My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1991 AGN FEB 05 I25
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1991
>
1991 February 05 Agenda Packet
>
1991 AGN FEB 05 I25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 2:01:33 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL Q <br />FOR: Council Meeting of 5 February 1991 �± <br />FROM: Jaime R. Aguilera, Director of Community Development*� <br />SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance on Program for Seismic Retrofitting of <br />Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. E <br />BACKGROUND: <br />State Bill SB547, passed in 1986, requires local governments prepare a seismic hazard <br />building survey and the adoption of a seismic hazard mitigation program. <br />The Community Development Department coordinated the preparation of the survey and D <br />seismic hazard mitigation report, as previously submitted. As shown in the report, the <br />survey identifed 31 structures (of which nine have been deleted) that are apparently of <br />unreinforced masonry construction. The owners of the unreinforced buildings were A <br />notified and a meeting was set up to discuss the retrofitting. The outcome of the meeting <br />was that all the owners requested the City impose minimum requirements for the retrofit- <br />ting, which involves the application of anchor bolts. <br />The request of applying minimum requirements in the form of anchorbolts provides ninety <br />to ninety-five percent of the retrofitting, since the majority of failures of unreinforced <br />masonry buildings occur with the separation of the walls of the building from the roof. <br />Full compliance through the use of actual retrofitting of walls and strengthening of footings <br />provides the remaining five to ten percent of the retrofitting. <br />STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: <br />The 22 structures identified in the survey, as unreinforced masonry buildings, are a P <br />potential hazard in the case of an earthquake that could lead to the loss of life and the <br />destruction of property. <br />The earthquake damage possibilites for Colton include the future earthquakes on the San O <br />Andreas fault, San Jacinto fault, and other small events that will occur in the region. <br />ALTERNATIVES: R <br />With the need for compliance to the aforementioned state law, and after review by the <br />affected property owners, staff recommends partial retrofitting through the use of anchor - <br />bolts to hold the unreinforced masonry buildings through one of the three alternatives <br />listed below: <br />Agenda Report RETR02 CiIGiINI�- <br />Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.